To determine whether statin therapy influences the efficacy of thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) during PCI. The post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 3 Trial included 4,570 patients: 3,106 patients were on statin therapy and 1,464 patients were not on statin therapy at the time of PCI procedure. The primary outcome of this analysis was the 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) or major bleeding. The primary outcome occurred in 7.9% patients (n = 246) in the statin group versus 9.8% (n = 143) in the non-statin group (P = 0.036). There was an interaction in univariate (P = 0.028) and multivariable (P = 0.026) analysis between pre-PCI statin therapy and the type of antithrombotic therapy regarding myocardial infarction. In the statin group, bivalirudin significantly reduced the incidence of major bleeding (2.6 vs. 4.3%, P = 0.013) with no significant difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction (4.9 vs. 5.2%; P = 0.73) compared with UFH. In the non-statin group, bivalirudin was inferior to UFH regarding the incidence of myocardial infarction (7.1 vs. 4.1%, P = 0.013), yet major bleeding remained lower among bivalirudin-treated patients (4.0 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.25). This post-hoc analysis suggests the existence of an interaction between statin therapy before PCI and antithrombotic therapy during PCI. Patients receiving bivalirudin therapy at the time of PCI showed less periprocedural myocardial infarction when on pre-PCI statin therapy which has to be investigated in further studies.

In the Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE)-3 study upstream administration of abciximab additional to 600 mg clopidogrel loading did not reduce the infarct size in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate 1-year clinical outcomes in the BRAVE-3 study patients.

BACKGROUND:Erythropoietin improves myocardial function in experimental models of myocardial infarction. The aim of the present study was to determine the value of erythropoietin in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.METHODS AND RESULTS:This randomized, double-blind study included 138 patients admitted with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomly assigned to receive epoetin-β (3.33×104 U, n=68) or placebo (n=70) immediately and at 24 and 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months measured by MRI. Other end points included infarct size at 5 days and 6 months. Clinical adverse events (death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and infarct-related artery revascularization) were investigated at 30 days and 6 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction at 6-month follow-up was 52.0±9.1% in the erythropoietin group compared with 51.8±9.3% in the placebo group (P=0.92). Five days after percutaneous coronary intervention, left ventricular ejection fraction was 49.4±8.0% in the erythropoietin group and 50.8±7.3% in the placebo group (P=0.32); infarct size was 26.8±20.9% and 28.3±24.4% (P=0.76) and decreased to 17.3±14.3% and 20.9±16.4% at 6-month follow-up (P=0.27). The cumulative 6-month incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke or target vessel revascularization was 13.2% in the erythropoietin group and 5.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 7.66; P=0.15).CONCLUSIONS:In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, erythropoietin treatment did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction or reduce infarct size but may increase clinical adverse events.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00390832.

Objectives The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease.Background Both PES and SES have reduced the risk of restenosis, particularly in high-risk patient and lesion subsets. However, their comparative performance in uLMCA lesions is not known.Methods In this randomized study, 607 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for uLMCA were enrolled: 302 were assigned to receive a PES (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) and 305 assigned to receive a SES (Cypher, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey). The primary end point was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. The secondary end point was angiographic restenosis on the basis of the LMCA area analysis at follow-up angiography.Methods In this randomized study, 607 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for uLMCA were enrolled: 302 were assigned to receive a PES (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) and 305 assigned to receive a SES (Cypher, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey). The primary end point was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. The secondary end point was angiographic restenosis on the basis of the LMCA area analysis at follow-up angiography.Results At 1 year the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or TLR was 13.6% in the PES and 15.8% in the SES group (relative risk [RR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56 to 1.29, p = 0.44). One patient in the PES group (0.3%) and 2 patients in the SES group (0.7%) experienced definite stent thrombosis (p = 0.57). Mortality at 2 years was 10.7% in the PES and 8.7% in the SES group (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.95, p = 0.64). Angiographic restenosis was 16.0% with PES and 19.4% with SES (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.19, p = 0.30).Conclusions Implantation of either PES or SES in uLMCA lesions is safe and effective; both of these drug-eluting stents provide comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes. (Drug-Eluting-Stents for Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease [ISAR-LEFT-MAIN]; NCT00133237) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1760-8) (C) 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Background— The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab has improved the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, it is not known whether abciximab remains beneficial after adequate clopidogrel loading in patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results— A total of 800 patients with acute ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction within 24 hours from symptom onset, all treated with 600 mg clopidogrel, were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either abciximab (n=401) or placebo (n=399) in the intensive care unit before being sent to the catheterization laboratory. The primary end point, infarct size measured by single-photon emission computed tomography with technetium-99m sestamibi before hospital discharge, was 15.7±17.2% (mean±SD) of the left ventricle in the abciximab group and 16.6±18.6% of the left ventricle in the placebo group (P=0.47). At 30 days, the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent revascularization of the infarct-related artery was observed in 20 patients in the abciximab group (5.0%) and 15 patients in the placebo group (3.8%) (relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.6; P=0.40). Major bleeding complications were observed in 7 patients in each group (1.8%). Conclusion— Upstream administration of abciximab is not associated with a reduction in infarct size in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of symptom onset and receiving 600 mg clopidogrel.

Background: In experimental models erythropoietin not only improves myocardial function in acute myocardial infarction but also enhances reendothelialization after vessel wall injury and reduces neointima generation. Aim of this study was to analyze the angiographic restenosis in patients from the randomized, controlled Regeneration of Vital Myocardium in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Erythropoietin (REVIVAL-3) study. Methods and Results: Patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to receive epoetin beta (3.33×10 4 U, n=68) or placebo (n=70) immediately, at 24 and 48 hours after PCI. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 6 months. Quantitative coronary angiography at follow-up revealed a binary restenosis rate of 12% in the erythropoietin group and 7% in the placebo group (P=0.298). In segment diameter stenosis was 32±9% in the erythropoietin group versus 26±14% in the placebo group (P=0.046). Accordingly in segment minimal lumen diameter was 2.1±0.7mm after erythropoietin as compared to 2.3±0.6 in the placebo group P=0.070). Conclusion: In contrast to experimental findings, erythropoietin use in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI is associated with a certain risk increase of lumen renarrowing.

The ISAR-REACT 2 trial was designed to assess the effect of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of abciximab on clinical and angiographic restenosis after coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The angiographic substudy included 1,544 patients from the ISAR-REACT 2 trial randomly assigned to abciximab (771 patients) or placebo (773 patients). All patients were scheduled for routine angiographic follow-up at 6 to 8 months after intervention. The primary end point was incidence of angiographic in-segment binary restenosis. The secondary end point was 1-year incidence of target-lesion revascularization. Binary restenosis was observed in 21.9% of patients in the abciximab group and 24.5% of patients in the placebo group (p=0.29). Percentages of in-stent (29+/-22% vs 33+/-24%; p=0.02) and in-segment (35+/-20% vs 38+/-21%; p=0.04) diameter stenoses were significantly lower in the abciximab group than the placebo group. There was a strong trend toward lower 1-year incidence of target-lesion revascularization in patients treated with abciximab than in patients treated with placebo (13.6% vs 16.8%; p=0.08). In conclusion, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, abciximab therapy may have a slight positive impact on the prevention of restenosis.

BACKGROUND:Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.METHODS:We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization.RESULTS:The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P=0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P=0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.008).CONCLUSIONS:In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262054.)

Objectives The aim of this study was to test whether the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) Impella LP2.5 (Abiomed Europe GmbH, Aachen, Germany) provides superior hemodynamic support compared with the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).Background Cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure is associated with high mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). An LVAD may help to bridge patients to recovery from left ventricular failure.Methods In a prospective, randomized study, 26 patients with cardiogenic shock were studied. The primary end point was the change of the cardiac index (CI) from baseline to 30 min after implantation. Secondary end points included lactic acidosis, hemolysis, and mortality after 30 days.Results In 25 patients the allocated device (n = 13 IABP, n = 12 Impella LP2.5) could be safely placed. One patient died before implantation. The CI after 30 min of support was significantly increased in patients with the Impella LP2.5 compared with patients with IABP (Impella: Delta CI = 0.49 +/- 0.46 l/min/m(2); IABP: Delta CI = 0.11 +/- 0.31 l/min/m(2); p = 0.02). Overall 30-day mortality was 46% in both groups.Conclusions In patients presenting with cardiogenic shock caused by AMI, the use of a percutaneously placed LVAD (Impella LP 2.5) is feasible and safe, and provides superior hemodynamic support compared with standard treatment using an intra-aortic balloon pump. (Efficacy Study of LV Assist Device to Treat Patients With Cardiogenic Shock [ISAR-SHOCK]; NCT00417378) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1584-8) (C) 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

AIMS The aim of this study is to investigate whether the benefit of abciximab in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel is sustained at 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed 1-year follow-up of 2022 high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing urgent PCI, who were randomized to abciximab or placebo after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 trial. The combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 1 year was the primary outcome analysis. At 1 year, the primary outcome was reached in 23.3% of patients allocated to abciximab vs. 28.0% of patients allocated to placebo [relative risk (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95, P = 0.012]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 11.6% in patients allocated to abciximab vs. 15.3% in patients allocated to placebo (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION In high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing a PCI after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel, adverse events occurred less frequently with abciximab and the early benefit was maintained at 1 year after administration.

Objective We investigated how does troponin level (TnT) affect the benefit achieved by abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel. Methods The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT 2) trial included 2,022 patients with non-ST elevation ACS undergoing PCI who were randomized to abciximab or placebo after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. The patients were divided into groups with elevated TnT level (n = 1,049) and no elevated TnT level (n = 973). The primary end point of the trial was the composite of death, myocardial infarction and urgent reintervention at 30 days. Results In patients with elevated TnT level the incidence of the primary end point was 13.1% in the abciximab group Vs. 18.3% in the placebo group [relative risk (RR): 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.95, P = 0.02]. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 12.9% in the abciximab group vs. 17.9% in the placebo group (RR: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96, P = 0.03). In contrast, the incidence of the primary end point in patients with no elevated TnT level was identical in both treatment groups (4.6%). The risk of bleeding was not related to TnT level. Conclusions Baseline troponin level affects the benefit of abciximab in patients with ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel. Abciximab reduces the risk of ischemic events only in patients with ACS and elevated troponin level.

Background It is not known whether there exists a sex-dependent difference in the clinical benefit of abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods We performed this retrospective analysis of 2022 patients (498 women) with ACS enrolled in the Intraccronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 trial and randomized to receive abciximab or placebo during a PCI procedure. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 30 days after PCI was the primary end point of the study.Results Among men, the 30-day incidence of MACE was 8.6'/a in the abciximab group compared with 12.60%. in the placebo group, relative risk (RR) 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.94), P =.01. The 30-day incidence of MACE in women was 9.7% in the abciximab group compared with 9.90% in the placebo group, RR 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.56-1.72), P =.97. After adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, there was no significant interaction between sex and abciximob (P =7 1); adjusted RR was 0.70 (95% Cl, 0.3,4-1.34) in women and 0.60 (95% Cl, 0.40-0.90) in men. The incidence of major bleeding was significantly greater in women (3.6%) than in men (0.7%), RR 5.5 (95% Cl, 2.54-11.9), P< .001, without any dependence on the form of therapy received.Conclusions In patients with non-ST elevation ACS undergoing a PCI, the benefit with abciximab is greater in men than in women. This is apparently the result of sex-based differences in risk profile.