p s p p A T ( d a w 0 r e are honored to again provide readers of the Journal with comprehensive review of major scientific works related to nterventional cardiology published in 2004. Since our riginal 2003 review, the field of interventional cardiology as continued to expand rapidly. Although this field origially encompassed coronary interventions, we have been sked to include other cardiac (nonvalvular) interventions nd peripheral artery interventions. Our goal is not to rovide the reader with an exhaustive list of references; ather, we wish to organize all major practice-changing tudies and major randomized trials into themes. We believe hat noninterventional cardiologists can achieve a thorough pdate and that interventionists will be provided with a ramework for more intensive study. We have reviewed over 00 papers and selected 100 for inclusion. Although we ay have some biases in selection, we believe that these orks will move this field forward (Table 1). We hope you njoy reading about them as much as we enjoyed organizing hem for you.

Objectives. This study examined the predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after different reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction. Background. Thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty are bath widely applied as reperfusion modalities in patients with my0cardial infarction. Although it is accepted that restoration of early patency of the infarct-related artery can reduce mortality aad &age iipryoC~l;iilUiii, ihe upiimai reperfusion strategy W mains controversial, and the predictors of outcome in the reperfusion era have been incompletely characterized. Mebhods. At 12 centers, 395 patients presenting within 12 h of onset of acute transmural myocardial infarction were prospectively randomized to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or undergo primary angiopiasty without antecedent thrombolysis. Sixteen clinical variables were examined with univariate and multiple k&tic regression analysis to identify the predictors of clinical outcome.

ugenia Nikolsky, MD, PHD,*† Eve D. Aymong, MD, FACC,*† Amir Halkin, MD,*† indy L. Grines, MD, FACC,‡ David A. Cox, MD, FACC,§ Eulogio Garcia, MD, oxana Mehran, MD, FACC,*† James E. Tcheng, MD, FACC,¶ John J. Griffin, MD, FACC,# iulio Guagliumi, MD,** Thomas Stuckey, MD, FACC,†† Mark Turco, MD, FACC,‡‡ avid A. Cohen, MD, FACC,§§ Manuela Negoita, MD,*† Alexandra J. Lansky, MD, FACC,*† regg W. Stone, MD, FACC*† ew York, New York; Royal Oak, Michigan; Charlotte, Durham, and Greensboro, North Carolina; Madrid, Spain; irginia Beach, Virginia; Bergamo, Italy; Tacoma Park, Maryland; and Boston, Massachusetts

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often have multiple co-morbidities that influence outcome. We sought to evaluate the impact of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on the outcome of patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty. We evaluated 3,716 patients with AMI who underwent emergency catheterization with planned primary angioplasty in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trials. Patients with a history of PVD (claudication, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) were compared with patients without PVD. Of the 3,716 patients, 394 (10.6%) had PVD and were older, more often women, and more frequently had a history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization. They presented more often with a heart rate >100 beats/min, Killip class >1, lower ejection fraction, and multivessel disease. No difference was found in stent use, final percentage of stenosis, or Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow. Patients with PVD had a twofold increased in-hospital mortality (5.3% vs 2.6%, p = 0.0021). The difference remained significant at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year (12.6% vs 6%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a history of PVD was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and death at 1 year (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.57, p = 0.032). In conclusion, patients with AMI with PVD have increased co-morbidities and higher mortality despite treatment with primary angioplasty. The presence of PVD is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and death at 1 year.

We sought to determine whether diabetes mellitus independently conferred poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 3,742 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies with the intention of undergoing primary PCI, we compared in-hospital mortality, 6-month mortality, and 6-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), i.e., composite of death, reinfarction, or ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR), between diabetics (n = 626, 17%) and nondiabetics (n = 3,116, 83%). We evaluated the independent impact of diabetes on outcomes after adjustment for baseline clinical and angiographic differences. Diabetics had worse baseline clinical characteristics, longer pain onset-to-hospital arrival time, and longer door-to-balloon time. They had more multivessel coronary disease and lower left ventricular ejection fractions, but better baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow. Diabetics underwent primary PCI less often (88% vs 91%, p = 0.01). During the index hospitalization, diabetics were more likely to die (4.6% vs 2.6%, p = 0.005). During 6-month follow-up, diabetics had higher incidences of death (8.1% vs 4.2%, p <0.0001) and MACEs (18% vs 14%, p = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, diabetes was independently associated with 6-month mortality (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.26, p = 0.03), but not with in-hospital mortality or 6-month MACEs. We conclude that diabetics with AMI have less favorable baseline characteristics and are less likely to undergo primary PCI than nondiabetics. Despite excellent angiographic results, diabetics had significantly worse 6-month mortality.

The presence of intracoronary thrombus after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) worsens clinical outcomes. We performed this study to assess the incidence of intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the clinical impact of nonocclusive thrombus. In 2,148 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI)-2, Stent PAMI, and PAMI No-Surgery-On-Site trials, we compared clinical and angiographic characteristics of 131 patients (6%) who had angiographically visible thrombus after PCI with those who did not (n = 2,017). In the subset of 2,115 patients with post-PCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow, we assessed the impact of post-PCI thrombus (n = 110) on in-hospital, 1-month, and 1-year outcomes (reinfarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization [I-TVR], death, and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs] [i.e., death, reinfarction, or I-TVR]). Lack of stent use, presence of thrombus before PCI, and no history of PCI were independent correlates of post-PCI thrombus. Patients with nonocclusive thrombus after PCI had more reinfarctions during the index hospitalization (5.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.03) and at 1 month (6.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and had nonsignificantly higher I-TVR (during hospitalization 5.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.13; at 1 month 5.9% vs 3.4%, p = 0.17), but similar mortality and MACE rates as those without post-PCI thrombus. In multivariate analysis, post-PCI thrombus was not a significant predictor of in-hospital or 1-month reinfarction. At 1 year, clinical outcomes were similar between patient groups (reinfarction 8.3% vs 4.7%, p = 0.14; I-TVR 12.5% vs 12.1%, p = 0.91; death 5.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.68; and MACEs 21% vs 18%, p = 0.54). We conclude that residual intracoronary thrombus after primary angioplasty is relatively uncommon. In patients who achieve TIMI 2 or 3 flow after PCI, intracoronary thrombus is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. However, differences in outcomes between patients with and without residual thombus are related to baseline clinical differences rather than thrombus per se.

From the cohort of 4,023 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trials, we pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 1,521 patients with culprit lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA). We compared angiographic results, procedural complications, and in-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes between patients with proximal RCA (n = 572) versus nonproximal RCA culprit lesions (n = 949). Patients with proximal RCA culprit lesions were older, had lower systolic blood pressure, greater diameter stenosis, and were less likely to have Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow (19% vs 31%; p <0.0001) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). After PCI, the incidence of TIMI 3 flow (94% vs 93%) was similar between groups. Patients with proximal RCA lesions were more likely to have bradyarrhythmias (30% vs 23%, p = 0.016) and require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP; 4.6% vs 2%, p = 0.034) during PCI. In-hospital complications, including mortality (2.3% vs 2.2%) and reinfarction (1.4% vs 1.1%), and the 1-year incidence of death, reinfarction, ischemia driven target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events were similar between groups. After adjustment for baseline differences, proximal RCA location of the culprit lesion was independently associated with greater IABP use (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 5.58) but not with bradyarrhythmias during PCI. Thus, in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for primary angioplasty, proximal RCA location of the culprit lesion is associated with excellent clinical outcomes that are similar to nonproximal RCA lesions.

OBJECTIVES:We sought to characterize the presenting characteristics of patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to determine the angiographic success rate and clinical outcomes of a primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) strategy.BACKGROUND:Patients who have had previous CABG and AMI comprise a high risk group with decreased reperfusion success and increased mortality after thrombolytic therapy. Little is known about the efficacy of primary PTCA in AMI.METHODS:Early cardiac catheterization was performed in 1,100 patients within 12 h of onset of AMI at 34 centers in the prospective, controlled Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial (PAMI-2), followed by primary PTCA when appropriate. Data were collected by independent study monitors, end points were adjudicated and films were read at an independent core laboratory.RESULTS:Of 1,100 patients with AMI, 58 (5.3%) had undergone previous CABG. The infarct-related vessel in these patients was a bypass graft in 32 patients (55%) and a native coronary artery in 26 patients. Compared with patients without previous CABG, patients with previous CABG were older and more frequently had a previous myocardial infarction and triple-vessel disease. Coronary angioplasty was less likely to be performed when the infarct-related vessel was a bypass graft rather than a native coronary artery (71.9% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.001); Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) flow grade 3 was less frequently achieved (70.2% vs. 94.3%, p < 0.0001); and in-hospital mortality was increased (9.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.02). As a result, mortality at six months was 14.3% versus 4.1% in patients with versus without previous CABG (p = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, independent determinants of late mortality in the entire study group were advanced age, triple-vessel disease, Killip class and post-PTCA TIMI flow grade <3.CONCLUSIONS:Reperfusion success of a primary PTCA strategy in patients with previous CABG, although favorable with respect to historic control studies, is reduced as compared with that in patients without previous CABG. New approaches are required to treat patients with previous CABG and AMI, especially when the infarct-related vessel is a diseased saphenous vein graft.