Regulated helicase activation by DDK kinase is central for genome stability. However, how DDK phosphorylation primes the MCM2-7 double hexamer (DH) for Sld3-Sld7 binding and Cdc45 loading remained unclear. We define this mechanism through cryo-EM structures of MCM2-7 DH-Sld3-Sld7 (MS) and MCM2-7 DH-Sld3-Sld7-Cdc45 (MSC). We reveal that the autoinhibitory Mcm4 tail engages not only Mcm4 but also Mcm6. Upon DDK-dependent phosphorylation, both of these sites become accessible. In the context of the MS structure, we identify that two short Sld3 motifs that contact Mcm4 and Mcm6 read out the DH phosphorylation state, while the Sld3 Treslin domain (STD) binds to Mcm2. In the MSC structure, Cdc45 dislodges the Sld3 STD from Mcm2, allowing Sld3 to position Cdc45 at the Mcm2/Mcm5 interface. Mutagenesis of the Sld3 STD-Cdc45 interface disrupts Cdc45 loading, validating this interaction. Together, our data reveal a phosphorylation-encoded mechanism coupling DDK-activated Mcm4/Mcm6 surfaces to distal Cdc45 placement, explaining how firing factors choreograph the DH-to-CMG transition. DNA replication depends on loading Cdc45 onto the MCM2-7 helicase to start DNA unwinding. Here, the authors use cryo-EM to show how phosphorylation enables Sld3-Sld7 to bind MCM2-7 and position Cdc45 for helicase activation.

The mutually antagonistic relationship of atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and partitioning-defective protein 6 (Par6) with the substrate lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl) is essential for regulating polarity across many cell types. Although aPKC–Par6 phosphorylates Lgl at three serine sites to exclude it from the apical domain, aPKC–Par6 and Lgl paradoxically form a stable kinase–substrate complex, with conflicting roles proposed for Par6. We report the structure of human aPKCι–Par6α bound to full-length Llgl1, captured through an aPKCι docking site and a Par6PDZ contact. This complex traps a phospho-S663 Llgl1 intermediate bridging between aPKC and Par6, impeding phosphorylation progression. Thus, aPKCι is effectively inhibited by Llgl1pS663 while Llgl1 is captured by aPKCι–Par6. Mutational disruption of the Lgl–aPKC interaction impedes complex assembly and Lgl phosphorylation, whereas disrupting the Lgl–Par6PDZ contact promotes complex dissociation and Lgl phosphorylation. We demonstrate a Par6PDZ-regulated substrate capture-and-release model requiring binding by active Cdc42 and the apical partner Crumbs to drive complex disassembly. Our results suggest a mechanism for mutual regulation and spatial control of aPKC–Par6 and Lgl activities. Combining structural, biochemical, cellular and in vivo assays, the authors uncover the mechanism for capture and multisite phosphorylation of lethal (2) giant larvae by the atypical protein kinase C and partitioning-defective protein 6, revealing the basis for their mutual antagonism underpinning cell polarity.

The controlled assembly of replication forks is critical for genome stability. The Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase (DDK) initiates replisome assembly by phosphorylating the MCM2-7 replicative helicase at the N-terminal tails of Mcm2, Mcm4 and Mcm6. At present, it remains poorly understood how DDK docks onto the helicase and how the kinase targets distal Mcm subunits for phosphorylation. Using cryo-electron microscopy and biochemical analysis we discovered that an interaction between the HBRCT domain of Dbf4 with Mcm2 serves as an anchoring point, which supports binding of DDK across the MCM2-7 double-hexamer interface and phosphorylation of Mcm4 on the opposite hexamer. Moreover, a rotation of DDK along its anchoring point allows phosphorylation of Mcm2 and Mcm6. In summary, our work provides fundamental insights into DDK structure, control and selective activation of the MCM2-7 helicase during DNA replication. Importantly, these insights can be exploited for development of novel DDK inhibitors.

Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is a key apical-basal polarity determinant and Par complex component. It is recruited by Par3/Baz (Bazooka in Drosophila) into epithelial apical domains through high-affinity interaction. Paradoxically, aPKC also phosphorylates Par3/Baz, provoking its relocalization to adherens junctions (AJs). We show that Par3 conserved region 3 (CR3) forms a tight inhibitory complex with a primed aPKC kinase domain, blocking substrate access. A CR3 motif flanking its PKC consensus site disrupts the aPKC kinase N lobe, separating P-loop/αB/αC contacts. A second CR3 motif provides a high-affinity anchor. Mutation of either motif switches CR3 to an efficient in vitro substrate by exposing its phospho-acceptor site. In vivo, mutation of either CR3 motif alters Par3/Baz localization from apical to AJs. Our results reveal how Par3/Baz CR3 can antagonize aPKC in stable apical Par complexes and suggests that modulation of CR3 inhibitory arms or opposing aPKC pockets would perturb the interaction, promoting Par3/Baz phosphorylation.

Many components of epithelial polarity protein complexes possess PDZ domains that are required for protein interaction and recruitment to the apical plasma membrane. Apical localization of the Crumbs (Crb) transmembrane protein requires a PDZ-mediated interaction with Pals1 (protein-associated with Lin7, Stardust, MPP5), a member of the p55 family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases (MAGUKs). This study describes the molecular interaction between the Crb carboxy-terminal motif (ERLI), which is required for Drosophila cell polarity, and the Pals1 PDZ domain using crystallography and fluorescence polarization. Only the last four Crb residues contribute to Pals1 PDZ-domain binding affinity, with specificity contributed by conserved charged interactions. Comparison of the Crb-bound Pals1 PDZ structure with an apo Pals1 structure reveals a key Phe side chain that gates access to the PDZ peptide-binding groove. Removal of this side chain enhances the binding affinity by more than fivefold, suggesting that access of Crb to Pals1 may be regulated by intradomain contacts or by protein-protein interaction.

Significance The power of adaptive immunity in humans is realized through the hypervariable molecules: the T-cell receptors (TCRs). Each of those is built from genetically encoded parts with the addition of random nucleotides finally forming individual TCR repertoire. Despite that the individual TCR repertoire potentially can include 10 11 –10 14 different variants, substantially less molecules are found in a single individual. The particular genetic impact on the final set of TCR molecules is still poorly understood. In this study, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, we compare deep TCR repertoires of genetically identical twins. We found that, although TCR repertoires of any pair of individuals have the same amount of identical receptors, twin repertoires share certain specific features.

This study shows how the yeast Ctf4 protein couples the DNA helicase, Cdc45–MCM–GINS, to DNA polymerase α — the GINS subunit of the helicase and the polymerase use a similar interaction to bind Ctf4, suggesting that, as Ctf4 is a trimer, two polymerases could be simultaneously coupled to a single helicase during lagging-strand synthesis. During DNA replication, each polymerase is preceded by a helicase that disrupts the two strands, funnelling them into the leading- and lagging-strand machineries. This study, a collaboration between the laboratories of Luca Pellegrini, Alessandro Costa and Karim Labib, examines the structural basis for the action of the yeast Ctf4 protein that links DNA helicase and DNA polymerase components of the replisome. The authors delineate how Ctf4 couples the DNA helicase, Cdc45–MCM–GINS, to polymerase α. The GINS subunit of the helicase and the polymerase use a similar interaction to bind Ctf4, suggesting that, as Ctf4 is a trimer, two polymerases can be simultaneously coupled to a single helicase during lagging-strand synthesis. Efficient duplication of the genome requires the concerted action of helicase and DNA polymerases at replication forks1 to avoid stalling of the replication machinery and consequent genomic instability2,3,4. In eukaryotes, the physical coupling between helicase and DNA polymerases remains poorly understood. Here we define the molecular mechanism by which the yeast Ctf4 protein links the Cdc45–MCM–GINS (CMG) DNA helicase to DNA polymerase α (Pol α) within the replisome. We use X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy to show that Ctf4 self-associates in a constitutive disk-shaped trimer. Trimerization depends on a β-propeller domain in the carboxy-terminal half of the protein, which is fused to a helical extension that protrudes from one face of the trimeric disk. Critically, Pol α and the CMG helicase share a common mechanism of interaction with Ctf4. We show that the amino-terminal tails of the catalytic subunit of Pol α and the Sld5 subunit of GINS contain a conserved Ctf4-binding motif that docks onto the exposed helical extension of a Ctf4 protomer within the trimer. Accordingly, we demonstrate that one Ctf4 trimer can support binding of up to three partner proteins, including the simultaneous association with both Pol α and GINS. Our findings indicate that Ctf4 can couple two molecules of Pol α to one CMG helicase within the replisome, providing a new model for lagging-strand synthesis in eukaryotes that resembles the emerging model for the simpler replisome of Escherichia coli5,6,7,8. The ability of Ctf4 to act as a platform for multivalent interactions illustrates a mechanism for the concurrent recruitment of factors that act together at the fork.