目的 探讨聚焦解决模式在腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)术后恐动症患者中的应用效果.方法 采用便利抽样法选取2020年9月至2021年4月宁夏某三甲医院102例LDH术后恐动症患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和试验组,各51例.对照组接受常规护理,试验组在对照组基础上接受聚焦解决模式.比较两组的疼痛程度、恐动程度、不良情绪.结果 干预后,试验组的VAS、TSK评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预后,试验组的SDS、SAS评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 聚焦解决模式能有效降低LDH术后恐动症患者的疼痛程度、恐动程度,缓解其焦虑、抑郁等不良情绪.

Objective:To investigate the mid-term efficacy of Dynesys internal fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods:From June 2014 to June 2016, 68 cases, in which 35 males and 33 females aged from 44-74 (55.3±7.5), of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated using Dynesys internal fixation were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 cases of L 3, 52 cases of L 4 and 8 cases of L 5 with an average visual analogue scale (VAS) of 4.5±2.1. At the same time, 72 patients were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). There were 37 males and 35 females aged from 46-76 (56.8±7.2), with 9 cases of L 3, 53 cases of L 4 and 10 cases of L 5. The VAS of this group was 4.4±2.3. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and complications were compared between the two groups. Range of motion (ROM), disc height of stable segment and upper adjacent segment, adjacent segment degeneration between the two groups were evaluated. ASD, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were also compared between the two groups. Results:The patients in both groups were followed up. The follow-up time of Dynesys group was 50-74 months, average 64.2±18.3 months, and the follow-up time of PLIF group was 55-79 months, average 65.2±15.5 months. The operation time [(120.5±21.0) min vs. (132.5±27.0) min, t=2.924, P=0.004], intraoperative bleeding [(312.5±80.7) ml vs. (352.5±84.5) ml, t=2.861, P=0.005] and postoperative drainage [(120.3±45.8) ml vs. (140.2±50.2) ml; t=2.446, P=0.016] in Dynesys group were significantly better than those in PLIF group. The differences were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM of stable segment, ROM of upper segment, disc height of stable segment and adjacent segment between the two groups before operation. At 5 years postoperatively, there was statistically significant difference between the stable segment ROM (4.3°±1.6° vs. 0; t=22.809; P<0.001) and the upper segment ROM (10.5°±2.1° vs. 12.8°±2.2°; t=6.329, P<0.001). At 5 years postoperatively, ODI scores of the two groups were (11.25%±8.12%, 16.53%±9.23%), and JOA scores were (22.60±2.20, 19.01±2.34), which were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, with statistically significant differences (ODI: t=3.585, P<0.001; JOA: t=9.340, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic ASD between the two groups (8.8% vs. 16.7%, χ2=1.284, P=0.257) , but there was significant difference in the incidence of X-ray ASD between the two groups (2.9% vs. 13.9%, χ2=4.043, P=0.044) . Conclusion:Compared with PLIF, Dynesys internal fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a minimally invasive, safe and effective surgical method to retard ASD; Compared with PLIF, adjacent segment degeneration can be reduced using Dynesys internal fixation.

目的 探讨布氏杆菌性脊柱炎术前实验室及影像学检查特点,以提高对该病的诊断水平.方法 回顾性分析2013年12月至2015年12月在宁夏医科大学总医院脊柱骨科收治的40例布氏杆菌性脊柱炎患者的实验室与影像学检查资料,分析实验室检查中布氏杆菌凝集试验、C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)与影像学检查中DR、CT、MRI对诊断布氏杆菌性脊柱炎的价值.结果 40例患者布氏杆菌凝集试验均为阳性,ESR升高36例(90%),CRP升高39例(97.5%).病变累及腰椎最为常见(80.7%),其余依次为胸椎(8.0%)、骶椎(6.8%)、颈椎(4.5%).DR发现骨质破坏16例,椎间隙变窄28例,骨质增生31例;CT发现骨质破坏33例,骨质硬化6例,椎间隙变窄31例,韧带钙化13例,骨质增生35例;MRI发现骨质破坏38例,椎旁脓肿形成22例,硬膜外脓肿形成12例,椎间盘破坏18例,椎间隙变窄31例.结论 布氏杆菌性脊柱炎患者术前的实验室检查可明确机体炎症感染及感染类型,脊柱影像学检查可明确感染部位及严重程度,对布氏杆菌性脊柱炎的诊断可以提供有力的辅助诊断依据.术前实验室及影像学检查优势可互补,临床上利于诊断布氏杆菌性脊柱炎.

目的 比较双Endobutton和钩板治疗内固定治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱住的临床疗效.方法 选择行手术治疗的51例TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位患者,17例行双Endobutton内固定,34例行锁骨钩板板内固定.结果 51倒全部随访,随访时间平均11个月.双Endobutton内固定优良率88％,锁骨钩板内固定组优良率79％.结论 采用双Endobutton和锁骨钩板治疗肩锁关节脱位临床疗效可靠,但都出现不同程度的并发症,肩锁关节脱位选择内固定时,应全面个体化选择内固定.