Redesign the Parkinson's Foundation Learning Institute for the Black community living with Parkinson's

BACKGROUND:Population reflective research enrollment improves study generalizability and disease knowledge. Nevertheless, the proportion of underrepresented groups (URGs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) research remains low. Hence, the current manuscript describes the process of designing a study to analyze the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers to URG recruitment in PD research.METHODS:The Fostering Inclusivity in Research Engagement for Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson's Disease (FIRE-UP PD) study asked participating sites to identify a URG or geographical region to target to assess knowledge and attitudes toward PD research as well as increase Fox Insight (an online study with The Michael J. Fox Foundation) participation across eight months. URGs were defined as racial and ethnic minorities, women, rural populations, and low socioeconomic status groups. Participating sites were paired based on their proposed interventions and were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control condition.RESULTS:The FIRE-UP PD study was divided into pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention periods to measure changes in awareness and trust in PD research along with engagement and interest in PD protocols through the use of several surveys. Interventions included developing educational tools to engage local communities, building partnerships within local PD communities, and recruiting stakeholders to reimagine medical and research information for the community.CONCLUSION:Improving representation in research is a crucial step toward improving access to PD diagnoses and treatments. This is one of the first multi-site PD research studies to include community engagement to address barriers to research participation and improve research recruitment of URGs.

Background and Objectives To review the current evidence on the options available for initiating dopaminergic treatment of motor symptoms in early-stage Parkinson disease and provide recommendations to clinicians. Methods A multidisciplinary panel developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from a systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine–compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence. Results Initial treatment with levodopa provides superior motor benefit compared to treatment with dopamine agonists, whereas levodopa is more likely than dopamine agonists to cause dyskinesia. The comparison of different formulations of dopamine agonists yielded little evidence that any one formulation or method of administration is superior. Long-acting forms of levodopa and levodopa with entacapone do not appear to differ in efficacy from immediate-release levodopa for motor symptoms in early disease. There is a higher risk of impulse control disorders associated with the use of dopamine agonists than levodopa. Recommendations on initial therapy for motor symptoms are provided to assist the clinician and patient in choosing between treatment options and to guide counseling, prescribing, and monitoring of efficacy and safety.