BACKGROUND:Improved diagnostic tools for tuberculosis that are suitable for use in peripheral health centers are essential for reducing the persistent gap between estimated and notified cases. The diagnostic accuracy and usability of the MiniDock MTB test for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis is unknown. METHODS:We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study at outpatient centers in India, Nigeria, the Philippines, South Africa, Uganda, Vietnam, and Zambia. Patients 12 years of age or older with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled between September 12, 2024, and March 31, 2025. Assessment with MiniDock MTB was performed with sputum swabs and tongue swabs. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated against a sputum-culture-based reference and as compared with sputum-smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay. Usability was assessed with a system usability scale and direct observation. RESULTS:A total of 1380 participants were enrolled; 255 (18.5%) had human immunodeficiency virus infection and 226 (16.4%) had culture-confirmed tuberculosis. MiniDock MTB sensitivity was 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4 to 90.0) with sputum and 79.6% (95% CI, 73.8 to 84.7) with tongue swabs; specificity was greater than 97.5% for both. Results of sputum tests with MiniDock MTB closely matched those with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for sensitivity (difference, -2.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.0 to 0.5). MiniDock MTB had greater sensitivity than smear microscopy for tests of sputum (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.9 to 30.7) and tongue swabs (difference, 18.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 12.0 to 24.7). The test showed diagnostic accuracy that was consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) accuracy targets for near-point-of-care tuberculosis diagnostics (≥85% sensitivity for sputum and ≥75% for nonsputum and ≥98% specificity for both). The median score on the system usability scale (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability) was 75 (interquartile range, 65 to 80), which indicated good usability. No adverse events related to the index test were reported. CONCLUSIONS:MiniDock MTB met WHO targets for diagnostic accuracy and usability for tuberculosis detection across diverse clinical settings. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; Rapid Research in Diagnostics Development for TB Network and Assessing Diagnostics at Point-of-Care for Tuberculosis ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04923958 and NCT05941052.).

Tuberculosis remains a major global health challenge, despite recent advances in drug and regimen development. Pragmatic randomised trials are needed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of new tuberculosis treatments under routine care conditions to appropriately inform practice guidelines and facilitate uptake. In this Review, we propose guiding principles for pragmatic tuberculosis treatment trials. Using the PRECIS-2 framework, we address eligibility, recruitment, setting, organisation of care, adherence support, outcomes, follow-up, primary analysis, data collection, and monitoring. Pragmatic trials should maximise generalisability through broad inclusion criteria, integration within routine health systems, and flexible delivery approaches while maintaining appropriate standards for participant safety and data reliability. We discuss considerations for individually randomised and cluster-randomised designs, outcome definitions, risk-proportionate monitoring, and streamlined data collection. Adoption of these principles will improve the generation of real-world evidence and facilitate global implementation of effective tuberculosis treatments.

Background: Although clinical biomarkers of tuberculosis (TB) relapse are well characterized, the biological mechanisms underlying different treatment outcomes remain poorly understood. Elucidating these mechanisms may reveal improved biomarkers of long-term treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, global proteomic study on 60 participants with active pulmonary TB, half who were durably cured and half who relapsed. Plasma was collected at seven time-points: at treatment initiation (baseline), during therapy, and 52 weeks postbaseline. Samples were analyzed by high-resolution LC-MS/MS. Results: 2,418 proteins were identified across all samples, with 1,756 being differentially expressed relative to baseline (p < 0.05). 956 proteins were differentially abundant between cured and relapsed participants. Relapsed participants showed heightened humoral immunity throughout treatment, as well as upregulated complement activation and HDL particles. Cured participants exhibited elevated recovery-related pathways by week 4, including downregulated epithelial invasion and upregulated oxygen transport. Conclusions: Heightened humoral and innate immune responses were associated with relapse, whereas recovery signatures were associated with durable cure. Several proteins showed potential as relapse biomarkers and warrant future validation in independent cohorts. These findings advance our understanding of host responses to treatment and provide a basis for developing blood-based biomarkers to identify patients at increased risk of relapse.

Background: A 4-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen showed non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety to the standard 6-month control regimen at 12 months for the treatment of tuberculosis (S31/A5349, NCT02410772). We report the final 18-month outcomes. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial, two 4-month rifapentine-containing regimens were compared to a standard 6-month control regimen. Both investigational regimens replaced rifampin with rifapentine and, in one, moxifloxacin also replaced ethambutol and was given throughout treatment. All participants were followed for 18 months and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was used to distinguish relapse from reinfections. Findings: At 18 months, the rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen was non-inferior to control, with a difference in unfavorable outcomes of 1.1% (95% CI -2.4%,4.6%) in the microbiologically eligible primary analysis population, and 1.0% (95% CI -2.0%,4.1%) in the assessable primary analysis population, adjusted for baseline cavitation and HIV status. Although not demonstrated at 12 months, the rifapentine regimen was inferior to control at 18 months in both primary analysis populations with adjusted differences in unfavorable outcomes of 4.1% (95% CI 0.5%,7.8%) and 3.7% (95% CI 0.5%,7.0%) in the microbiologically eligible and assessable analysis populations, respectively. In the microbiologically eligible analysis population, 2 (0.3%), 8 (1.0%), and 19 (2.4%) participants had reinfection in the control, rifapentine-moxifloxacin and rifapentine regimens respectively. The number-needed-to-treat to prevent one unfavorable outcome with the control compared to the 4-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen is 91. Interpretation: At 18 months, a 4-month rifapentine-moxifloxacin regimen had non-inferior efficacy to control, but rifapentine without moxifloxacin had inferior efficacy to control.

Tuberculosis treatment trials have used various comparison strategies. To inform trial design for novel tuberculosis regimens, we applied an existing framework for evaluating when uncontrolled trials might be justified. We conclude that the conditions are not met for tuberculosis treatment and that uncontrolled phase 3 trials should not be performed.

Early development of tuberculosis (TB) treatments often separates dose-finding in healthy volunteers (Phase I) and safety and early activity in patients (Phase IIa). The BTZ-043 study (NCT04044001) is a recent study that combined these two objectives in patients in a single study. In this work, we describe and compare three different design options which consider safety and activity endpoints differently in the dose escalation process. In simulations we show that the design that incorporates information about activity together with safety in the dose escalation process allows more precise estimation of the optimal dose and leads to a higher power on average in selecting at least one suitable dose at the end of the study compared to the design that considers only the safety endpoint for dose escalation.

BACKGROUND:Safer, more effective treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis are needed. METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, open-label, pragmatic, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial in South Africa to assess a 6-month treatment strategy for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Participants with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis who were 6 years of age or older were randomly assigned to a regimen consisting of bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine or both for 6 months (trial-strategy group) or the 9-month standard-of-care treatment regimen that was current in South Africa (control group). Persons who were pregnant or breastfeeding and those who had fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis were included in the trial population. Treatment in both groups was adjusted on the basis of results of second-line drug susceptibility testing. The primary efficacy end point was a successful outcome (cure or completion of treatment) at the end of treatment and at 76 weeks after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points. The primary safety end point was an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. RESULTS:Among the 432 persons who were screened, 403 underwent randomization; 203 were assigned to the trial-strategy group, and 200 to the control group. A successful outcome was observed in 174 of 202 participants (86.1%) in the trial-strategy group and in 172 of 200 (86.0%) in the control group. The adjusted risk difference was -0.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.9 to 6.5; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred during treatment in 63 of 202 participants (31.2%) in the trial-strategy group and in 74 of 200 (37.0%) in the control group; 10 participants in each group died. CONCLUSIONS:Among participants in South Africa with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, the 6-month trial strategy was noninferior to the standard-of-care strategy with respect to a successful outcome. The safety profiles of the two strategies were similar. (Funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and others; BEAT Tuberculosis ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04062201.).

ABSTRACT Culture‐based monitoring of bacterial load is slow and susceptible to missing data, contributing to the length and cost of TB clinical trials. Non‐culture‐based alternatives, like the Tuberculosis Molecular Load Bacterial Assay (TB‐MBLA), could represent a solution. Our objectives were to evaluate TB‐MBLA as a biomarker in early bactericidal activity (EBA) studies and explore whether combining biomarkers with joint modeling could provide insight into underlying biological processes. We generated TB‐MBLA (LifeArc) data from sputum samples from all 78 patients from the PanACEA BTZ‐043 Phase Ib/IIa trial and derived a summary measure of the joint distribution of the three TB‐MBLA, colony forming units (CFU), and time‐to‐positivity (TTP) biomarkers as the first principal component derived from a probabilistic principal component analysis (pPCA). With TB‐MBLA marker and the principal component 1 (PC1) values, we reevaluated the original stage IIa dose–response and stages Ib/IIa pharmacokinetics—pharmacodynamics (PK‐PD) exposure‐response analyses, applying linear and non‐linear mixed models, respectively. For TB‐MBLA, we could not detect an exposure‐response effect in the PK‐PD analysis, in contrast with CFU and TTP. When combining biomarkers, we observed a significant but less pronounced Emax exposure–response between days 0–3 compared with CFU and TTP alone. We also successfully applied pPCA as a modeling framework and show evidence that combining CFU and TTP in a joint latent component can improve detection of treatment effects compared with either biomarker alone. In this study, we present novel EBA data for the first‐in‐class antimycobacterial compound BTZ‐043 and contextualize the value of emerging bacteriological markers within the EBA trial framework. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04044001

BACKGROUND:Accessible, accurate screening tests are necessary to advance tuberculosis case finding and early detection in high-burden countries. METHODS:We prospectively screened adults with ≥2 weeks of cough at primary health centers in the Philippines, Vietnam, South Africa, Uganda, and India. Participants underwent chest radiography, Cepheid Xpert TB Host Response (Xpert HR) testing, and point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) testing (Boditech). Chest radiographs were processed using CAD4TB v7, a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm. We assessed diagnostic accuracy against a microbiologic reference standard (sputum Xpert Ultra, culture). Optimal cutoff points were chosen to maximize specificity at 90% sensitivity. Two-test screening algorithms were considered, using (1) sequential negative serial screening (with positive defined as positive on either test) and (2) sequential positive serial screening (with positive defined as positive on both tests). RESULTS:Between July 2021 and August 2022, a total of 1392 participants with presumptive tuberculosis had valid index tests and reference standard results, and 303 (22%) had confirmed tuberculosis. In head-to-head comparisons, CAD4TB v7 showed the highest specificity at 90% sensitivity (70.3% vs 65.1% for Xpert HR [95% confidence interval for absolute difference in specificity, 1.6%-8.9%] and vs 49.7% for CRP [17.0%-24.3%]). Three 2-test screening algorithms met World Health Organization target product profile minimum accuracy thresholds and had higher accuracy than any test alone. At 90% sensitivity, the specificity was 79.6% for Xpert HR-CAD4TB (sequential negative), 75.9% for CRP-CAD4TB (sequential negative), and 73.7% for Xpert HR-CAD4TB (sequential positive). CONCLUSIONS:CAD4TB achieves target product profile targets and outperforms Xpert HR and CRP. Combining screening tests further increased accuracy. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04923958.

BACKGROUND:For decades, poor treatment options and low-quality evidence plagued care for patients with rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. The advent of new drugs to treat tuberculosis and enhanced funding now permit randomized, controlled trials of shortened-duration, all-oral treatments for rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial to compare standard therapy for treatment of fluoroquinolone-susceptible, rifampin-resistant tuberculosis with five 9-month oral regimens that included various combinations of bedaquiline (B), delamanid (D), linezolid (L), levofloxacin (Lfx) or moxifloxacin (M), clofazimine (C), and pyrazinamide (Z). Participants were randomly assigned (with the use of Bayesian response-adaptive randomization) to receive one of five combinations or standard therapy. The primary end point was a favorable outcome at week 73, defined by two negative sputum culture results or favorable bacteriologic, clinical, and radiologic evolution. The noninferiority margin was -12 percentage points. RESULTS:Among the 754 participants who underwent randomization, 699 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 562 in the per-protocol analysis. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 80.7% of the patients in the standard-therapy group had favorable outcomes. The risk difference between standard therapy and each of the four new regimens that were found to be noninferior in the modified intention-to-treat population was as follows: BCLLfxZ, 9.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 18.7); BLMZ, 8.3 percentage points (95% CI, -0.8 to 17.4); BDLLfxZ, 4.6 percentage points (95% CI, -4.9 to 14.1); and DCMZ, 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -7.5 to 12.5). Differences were similar in the per-protocol population, with the exception of DCMZ, which was not noninferior in that population. The proportion of participants with grade 3 or higher adverse events was similar across the regimens. Grade 3 or higher hepatotoxic events occurred in 11.7% of participants overall and in 7.1% of those receiving standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS:Consistent results across all the analyses support the noninferior efficacy of three all-oral shortened regimens for the treatment of rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. (Funded by Unitaid and others; endTB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02754765.).

BACKGROUND:Linezolid plays a crucial role in the first-line treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis globally. Its prolonged use can lead to neurological and haematological toxicity, highlighting the need for safer oxazolidinones. Delpazolid, a novel oxazolidinone, might be safer. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delpazolid and identify an optimal dose. METHODS:PanACEA-DECODE-01 was a prospective, randomised, open-label, phase 2b, multicentre, dose-finding trial done in five tuberculosis trial sites in Tanzania and South Africa. Adults aged 18-65 years, who weighed 40-90 kg, and had newly diagnosed, smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) through centralised allocation, using a probabilistic minimisation algorithm to receive no delpazolid (D0), delpazolid 400 mg once daily (D400), delpazolid 800 mg once daily (D800), delpazolid 1200 mg once daily (D1200), or delpazolid 800 mg twice daily (D800BD), all administered orally for 16 weeks with follow-up to week 52. All participants received bedaquiline (400 mg orally once daily for the first 14 days, then 200 mg orally thrice weekly), delamanid (100 mg orally twice daily), and moxifloxacin (400 mg orally once daily). Randomisation was stratified based on bacterial load in sputum as measured by GeneXpert cycle threshold (<16 vs ≥16), site, and HIV status. The primary efficacy objective was to establish an exposure-response model with the primary endpoint, measured in the modified intention-to-treat population, of change in mycobacterial load measured by time to positivity using the liquid culture mycobacterial growth indicator tube system. A secondary outcome was the time on treatment to sustained conversion to negative sputum culture in liquid media. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of oxazolidinone class toxicities defined as peripheral or optical neuropathy, incident leukopenia, anaemia or thrombocytopenia, or adverse events in line with tyramine pressor response, all of grade 2 or higher, possibly, probably or definitely related to delpazolid. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04550832. FINDINGS:Between Oct 28, 2021, and Aug 31, 2022, 156 individuals were screened for eligibility, 76 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to D0 (n=15), D400 (n=15), D800 (n=15), D1200 (n=16), or D800BD (n=15). 60 (79%) of 76 participants were male and 16 (21%) were female. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling suggests maximal microbiological activity at a daily total exposure of delpazolid (area under the concentration curve from 0 h to 24 h [AUC0-24]) of 50 mg/L per h; close to the median exposure observed after a 1200 mg dose. This maximal effect was estimated at a 38% (95% CI 4-83; p=0·025) faster decline in bacterial load compared with no delpazolid. In the secondary time-to-event analysis, there was no significant difference in time to culture conversion between treatment arms or exposure tertile. When all delpazolid-containing groups were combined, the hazard ratio for the time to sustained culture conversion to negative, comparing all delpazolid-containing groups with the group without delpazolid was 1·53 (95% CI 0·84-2·76). Two drug-related serious adverse events (one gastritis and one anaemia) occurred in the D800BD group, with high individual AUC0-24. Apart from the anaemia and one event of brief, moderate neutropenia observed at only one visit in the D800 group not in line with the characteristics of oxazolidinone class toxicity, no oxazolidinone class toxicities occurred. INTERPRETATION:The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling results suggest that delpazolid adds efficacy on top of bedaquiline, delamanid, and moxifloxacin; and that a dose of 1200 mg once daily would result in exposures with maximum efficacy. That dose was shown to be safe, raising hope that linezolid toxicities could be averted in long-term treatment. Delpazolid is a promising drug for future tuberculosis treatment regimens and could be widely usable if safety and efficacy are confirmed in larger trials. FUNDING:LigaChem Biosciences, EDCTP2 programme supported by the EU; German Ministry for Education and Research; German Center for Infection Research; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation; and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.

INTRODUCTION:Preclinical and clinical study data show that combining bedaquiline (B or BDQ), moxifloxacin (M), and pyrazinamide (Z), known as BMZ, has potent antimicrobial activity that might shorten treatment duration for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS/DESIGN:We describe the design of Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (TBTC) Study 38/CRUSH-TB (NCT05766267), an open-label multicenter international randomized controlled phase 2C trial that compares two four-month regimens, BMZ plus rifabutin (Rb) (2BMZRb/2BMRb) or BMZ plus delamanid (D or DLM) (2BMZD/2BMD), with standard 6-months isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE). All drugs are administered seven days per week, under direct observation, at least five days per week. A total of 288 participants, aged ≥12 years, newly diagnosed with sputum smear-positive or Xpert MTB/RIF (Ultra)-positive drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis, will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive BMZRb, BMZD, or HRZE. Participants are followed until 78 weeks post-randomization, or until the last enrolled participant completes 52 weeks post-randomization, whichever comes first. The primary endpoint is time to sputum culture negative in liquid media. Secondary endpoints include sustained cure, safety, and additional mycobacteriology and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes. This trial has an adaptive design, wherein new arms can be added. DISCUSSION:This trial tests the hypothesis whether four-month BMZ-based regimens with Rb or D can shorten time to culture negativity while being safe and tolerable for participants. The study design is adaptive, allowing for additional study arms as new drugs become available. Findings from this trial might have important implications for clinically managing drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis at individual and programmatic levels. Trial registration IND Number: 158058. IND Sponsor: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CLINICALTRIALS:govIdentifier:NCT05766267. Registered 13 March 2023, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS:gov/ct2/show/NCT05766267.

INTRODUCTION:BTZ-043 is a first-in-class benzothiazinone for the treatment of TB with demonstrated early bactericidal activity. BTZ-043 is metabolized into two major metabolites: M1 and M2. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and early exposure-response (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, PK/PD) relationship for BTZ-043. METHODS:A population PK/PD model for BTZ-043 and its metabolites was developed using data from a sequential Phase 1b/2a, randomized, controlled clinical trial in participants with pulmonary TB. BTZ-043 was administered in daily doses ranging from 250 to 1750 mg over 14 days. The decrease in bacterial load was determined by culture of sputum samples to quantify cfu on solid medium, and time to positivity in liquid medium. RESULTS:In total, 77 participants received the experimental treatment. PK were best described by two-compartment disposition models for BTZ-043 and M2, and a one-compartment disposition model for M1. When given without food, the bioavailability was 54% (95% CI: 43%-65%) lower than with food. The decrease in bacterial load was described by a bilinear model with estimated node at 48 h. Participants in the highest dose group in Stage 2 (1000 mg) had a 2-fold faster decrease in mycobacterial load during the initial 2 days compared with participants in the lowest dose group (250 mg), driven by an Emax relationship to the BTZ-043total exposure (BTZ-043 + M2). CONCLUSIONS:We characterized the population PK/PD of BTZ-043 in trial participants with pulmonary TB. An exposure-response relationship was only apparent for the first 2 days on treatment, indicating the need for further dose-finding studies.

The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment must strike a delicate balance: it must be long enough to achieve desirable efficacy yet short enough to prevent the development of toxicities, adverse events, and mitigate other arduous aspects related to patient burden. Historically, the approach used to determine duration of antibiotic treatment has been inefficient, severely impacting the refinement of therapeutics for tuberculosis (TB) where treatment duration, and its complications, can be extensive. Many of the challenges in duration-ranging have parallels and proposed solutions in the field of dose-ranging where the literature is substantially more established and where the traditions of qualitative, pairwise comparison studies have been replaced with model-based approaches. Such methods are more efficient and allow for interpolation between the doses observed. This work examines the utility of cutting-edge dose-finding methods (such as MCP-Mod) for duration-ranging of TB treatments. We compare the operating characteristics of the adapted model-based duration-ranging methodologies against standard qualitative methods for the purposes of estimating optimal duration and describing the duration-response relationship, using a simulation study motivated by a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Response Over Continuous Intervention (MAMS-ROCI) clinical trial design. We explore three specific targets: (1) power to detect a duration-response relationship, (2) ability to accurately reproduce the duration-response curve, and (3) ability to estimate the optimal duration within an acceptable margin of error. We find that model-based methods outperform standard qualitative comparisons on every target examined, particularly when the sample size is constrained to that of a typical Phase II trial. We conclude that the success of the next era in TB therapeutics duration evaluation trials, and antibiotics duration-ranging more broadly, will meaningfully rely on the ability to simultaneously pair innovative model-based statistical methods with re-imagined study designs such as MAMS-ROCI.

Rationale: C-reactive protein (CRP)-based tuberculosis (TB) screening is recommended for people with HIV. However, its performance among people without HIV and in diverse settings is unknown. Objectives: In a multicountry study, we aimed to determine whether CRP meets the minimum accuracy targets (sensitivity 90%, specificity 70%) for an effective TB screening test. Methods: Consecutive outpatient adults with cough 2 weeks from five TB endemic countries in Africa and Asia had baseline blood collected for point-of-care CRP testing and HIV and diabetes screening. Sputum samples were collected for Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) testing and culture. CRP sensitivity and specificity (5 mg/L cut-point) was determined in reference to sputum test results and compared by country, sex, and HIV and diabetes status. Variables affecting CRP performance were identified using a multivariate receiver operating curve regression model. Measurements and Main Results: Among 2,904 participants, of whom 613 (21%) had microbiologically confirmed TB, CRP sensitivity was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81-87%) and specificity was 61% (95% CI, 59-63%). CRP accuracy varied geographically, with higher sensitivity in African countries ( 91%) than Asian countries (64-82%). Sensitivity was higher among men than women (86% vs. 78%; difference, +8%; 95% CI, 1-15%) and specificity was lower among people with HIV than people without HIV (64% vs. 45%; difference, +19%; 95% CI, 13-25%). Receiver operating curve regression identified country and measures of TB disease severity as predictors of CRP performance. Conclusions: Overall, CRP did not achieve the minimum accuracy targets, and its performance varied by setting and in some subgroups, likely reflecting population differences in mycobacterial load.

INTRODUCTION:Many drugs for the treatment of TB prolong the QTc interval, which is associated with an increased risk of developing a life-threatening arrhythmia known as torsades de pointes. Sutezolid and delpazolid are novel oxazolidinones with demonstrated bactericidal activity. We aimed to assess the effects of sutezolid or delpazolid co-administered with bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin on the QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction). Furthermore, we developed a population pharmacodynamic model to assess the effects of drug exposure on the QTcTBT interval (TB-specific correction). METHODS:Participants were randomized to receive standard-dose bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin with varying doses of either sutezolid (no sutezolid, 600 mg daily, 1200 mg daily, 600 mg twice daily, 800 mg twice daily) or delpazolid (no delpazolid, 400 mg daily, 800 mg daily, 1200 mg daily, 800 mg twice daily). The QTc interval was determined using weekly ECG assessments. RESULTS:Data from 149 participants, yielding 2373 ECG observations were available for analysis. Nine participants (6.0%) experienced a Grade 3 QTcF prolongation as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The population pharmacodynamic model predicted a 13.2 ms (95% CI: 10.9-15.3) increase of the QTcTBT in the first week of treatment, but no further increase after that. The exposure of bedaquiline's M2 metabolite was found to drive part of the QTcTBT. No exposure-response relationship was identified for the other drugs investigated. CONCLUSIONS:The drug regimens containing standard doses of bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin, and varying doses of sutezolid or delpazolid were not found to pose a high cardiac risk in a population without further QTc-relevant risk factors. However, close monitoring of the QTc interval remains essential in patients with TB treated with combination drug therapy with known QTc-prolonging drugs.

BACKGROUND:Current guidelines for the treatment of multidrug-resistant/rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) are based on clinical trials evaluating fixed duration regimens. However, when a regimen succeeds, it remains unknown whether a shorter duration could yield the same results. Similarly, if a regimen fails, it is unclear whether extending the treatment could improve outcomes. Trials are needed to assess the relationship between various treatment durations and outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN:We designed a duration-randomized trial of treatment for fluoroquinolone-susceptible MDR/RR-TB. The DRAMATIC (Duration Randomized Anti-MDR-TB And Tailored Intervention Clinical) Trial is a multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, four-arm, phase 2 trial that examines an all oral, pyrazinamide-free regimen of bedaquiline, clofazimine, delamanid, linezolid, and levofloxacin, with administration of linezolid only in the initial 16 weeks of treatment. The four trial arms are treatment durations of 16, 24, 32 and 40 weeks. Randomization is stratified by "extensive" or "non-extensive" disease based on baseline smear (or Xpert) and cavitary status. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival at week 76. The target sample size is 220. Participants are being enrolled in sites in the Philippines and Vietnam. The expected output will be an equation describing the relationship between treatment duration and the proportion of participants with relapse-free survival. DISCUSSION:This trial aims to demonstrate that a duration-response relationship can be described for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB by a duration-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND:The broad use of bedaquiline and pretomanid as the mainstay of new regimens to combat tuberculosis is a risk due to increasing bedaquiline resistance. We aimed to assess the safety, bactericidal activity, and pharmacokinetics of BTZ-043, a first-in-class DprE1 inhibitor with strong bactericidal activity in murine models. METHODS:This open-label, dose-expansion, randomised, controlled, phase 1b/2a trial was conducted in two specialised tuberculosis sites in Cape Town, South Africa. Adults aged 18-64 years with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis sensitive to rifampicin and isoniazid, who weighed at least 40 kg, had a positive sputum smear graded at least 1+, were HIV negative, and had no history of hypertension or other substantial comorbidities were admitted to hospital. In stage 1 (multiple-ascending dose phase 1b with an adaptive continual reassessment method), the starting dose of BTZ-043 was 250 mg, with planned dose increments of 250 mg up to 2000 mg, and cohorts of three participants were enrolled sequentially. In stage 2 (phase 2a dose-expansion stage), participants were randomly assigned (3:3:3:2) to receive one of three doses of oral BTZ-043 (decided after stage 1) or standard of care (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) using sealed opaque envelopes. The BTZ-043 groups also received oral dolutegravir (a third of participants) or a probe drug cocktail (caffeine [probe for CYP1A2], tolbutamide [CYP2C9], dextromethorphan [CYP2D6], midazolam [CYP3A4], and digoxin [P-glycoprotein]; two-thirds of participants). Study staff and participants were not masked, but laboratory staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was to assess the safety and tolerability of BTZ-43 over 14 days of dosing by evaluation of adverse events in the safety analysis population. Secondary outcomes were bactericidal activity, measured by time to positivity (TTP) and colony-forming unit (CFU) count; pharmacokinetics (stage 2; including the food effect on BTZ-043); and drug-drug interactions with CYP450 enzymes, P-glycoprotein, and dolutegravir. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04044001 (completed). FINDINGS:In stage 1, 61 patients were assessed for eligibility and 24 were enrolled into seven dose cohorts between Nov 13, 2019, and Aug 13, 2020. Dose escalations were performed safely up to 1750 mg of BTZ-043 with three participants per dose cohort (and two dose cohorts for the highest dose). In stage 2, 151 patients were assessed for eligibility and 54 were enrolled and randomly assigned between Feb 2, 2021, and Feb 9, 2022, to receive 250, 500, and 1000 mg of BTZ-043 or standard of care. 66 (85%) of 78 participants were male and 12 (15%) were female. The most frequently observed adverse events were nausea (12 [8%] of 154), headache (11 [7%]), dizziness (11 [7%]), and vomiting (eight [5%]). Most participants had adverse events of mild (46 [60%] of 77 participants) or moderate (22 [29%]) severity. Transient increases in alanine aminotransferase were observed in both stages, which declined again despite continued dosing and were classified as signs of adaptation of hepatic metabolism rather than hepatotoxicity. The worsening of pre-existing anaemia and QTcF interval prolongation in one individual each were rated as possibly related to the study drug. One patient died before the first scheduled dose of BTZ-043 500 mg due to a pulmonary embolism. In stage 1, bactericidal activity measured as CFU counts on solid media was highest at doses 750-1500 mg; in stage 2, all doses of BTZ-043 showed 14-day bactericidal activity, highest at 1000 mg on solid media (log10 CFU/mL per day -0·115 [95% CI -0·162 to -0·069]) and TTP estimates were highest at 500 mg in liquid media (log10 h per day 0·015 [0·010 to 0·019]). BTZ-043 pharmacokinetics showed increased exposure with high-fat food versus fasting (area under the curve [AUC]0-last geometric mean ratio 4·13 [90% CI 1·65 to 10·30] for BTZ-043; 2·99 [1·39 to 6·41] for BTZ-043total [BTZ-043 plus metabolite 2]; and 1·25 [0·66 to 2·39] for metabolite 1). When taken with a standard breakfast, BTZ-043total AUC showed a dose-proportional increase up to 33 200 ng/mL × h (range 12 500 to 48 200) at 1000 mg. The maximum concentration (Cmax) increased to 5060 ng/mL (2450 to 8020); and median half-life was 3·72 h (2·45 to 6·60). Probe drug evaluations showed bioequivalence (ie, 90% CI of the AUC0-infinity geometric mean ratio from administration to day 14 entirely within the range of 80 to 125%) for caffeine (100·0% [90% CI 86·3 to 115·9]), digoxin (113·4% [105·9 to 121·5]), and dolutegravir (106·1% [91·5 to 122·9]). Dextromethorphan (116·2% [104·6 to 129·1]), tolbutamide (252·7% [230·7 to 276·9]), and midazolam (77·0% [69·2 to 85·6]) did not meet the bioequivalence criterion. INTERPRETATION:Based on a small sample size, BTZ-043 is a promising antituberculosis drug candidate with favourable safety and good bactericidal activity. Larger follow-up studies are needed to detect any less frequent safety signals, further explore drug-drug interactions, identify the best dose, and evaluate efficacy in combination with other drugs. FUNDING:EDCTP2 programme; German Ministry for Education and Research; German Center for Infection Research; InfectControl; Bavarian Ministry for Science and the Arts; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and Innovation; and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.