An anamorphic encryption scheme allows two parties who share a so-called double key to embed covert messages in ciphertexts of an established PKE scheme. This protects against a dictator that can force the receiver to reveal the secret keys for the PKE scheme, but who is oblivious about the existence of the double key. We identify two limitations of the original model by Persiano, Phan, and Yung (EUROCRYPT 2022). First, in their definition a double key can only be generated once, together with a key-pair. This has the drawback that a receiver who wants to use the anamorphic mode after a dictator comes to power, needs to deploy a new key-pair, a potentially suspicious act. Second, a receiver cannot distinguish whether or not a ciphertext contains a covert message. In this work we propose a new model that overcomes these limitations. First, we allow to associate multiple double keys to a key-pair, after its deployment. This also enables deniability in case the double key only depends on the public key. Second, we propose a natural robustness notion, which guarantees that anamorphically decrypting a regularly encrypted message results in a special symbol indicating that no covert message is contained, which also eliminates certain attacks. Finally, to instantiate our new, stronger definition of anamorphic encryption, we provide generic and concrete constructions. Concretely, we show that ElGamal and Cramer-Shoup satisfy a new condition, selective randomness recoverability , which enables robust anamorphic extensions, and we also provide a robust anamorphic extension for RSA-OAEP.

. A universal re-encryption (URE) scheme is a public-key encryption scheme enhanced with an algorithm that on input a ciphertext, outputs another ciphertext which is still a valid encryption of the underlying plaintext. Crucially, such a re-encryption algorithm does not need any key as input, but the ciphertext is guaranteed to be valid under the original key-pair. Therefore, URE schemes lend themselves naturally as building blocks of mixnets: A sender transmits the encryption of a message under the receivers public-key to a mixer, which re-encrypts it, and the receiver later retrieves the re-encrypted ciphertext, which will decrypt successfully to the original message. Young and Yung (SCN 2018) argued that the original definition of URE by Golle et al. (CT-RSA 2004) was flawed, because it did not consider anonymity of encryption. This motivated them to claim that they finally put URE on solid grounds by presenting four formal security notions which they argued a URE should satisfy. As our first contribution, we introduce a framework that allows to compactly define and relate security notions as substitutions of systems . Using such framework, as our second contribution we show that Young and Yung’s four notions are not minimal, and therefore do not properly capture the essence of a secure URE scheme. We provide three definitions that imply (and are implied by) theirs. Using the constructive cryptography framework, our third contribution is to capture the essence of URE from an application point of view by providing a composable security notion that expresses the ideal use of URE in a mixnet. Finally, we show that the composable notion is implied by our three minimal notions.

Deniable Authentication is a highly desirable property for secure messaging protocols: it allows a sender Alice to authentically transmit messages to a designated receiver Bob in such a way that only Bob gets convinced that Alice indeed sent these messages. In particular, it guarantees that even if Bob tries to convince a (non-designated) party Judy that Alice sent some message, and even if Bob gives Judy his own secret key, Judy will not be convinced: as far as Judy knows, Bob could be making it all up! In this paper we study Deniable Authentication in the setting where Judy can additionally obtain Alice’s secret key. Informally, we want that knowledge of Alice’s secret key does not help Judy in learning whether Alice sent any messages, even if Bob does not have Alice’s secret key and even if Bob cooperates with Judy by giving her his own secret key. This stronger flavor of Deniable Authentication was not considered before and is particularly relevant for Group Messaging as it gives users stronger deniability guarantees. Our main contribution is a scalable “ ” ( ) scheme—a technical formalization of Deniable Authentication that is particularly useful for secure messaging for its confidentiality guarantees—that provides this stronger deniability guarantee. At its core lie new $$\mathrm { M{\textrm{DVS}}}$$ (Multi-Designated Verifier Signature) and $$\text {PKEBC}$$ (Public Key Encryption for Broadcast) scheme constructions: our $$\mathrm { M{\textrm{DVS}}}$$ is not only secure with respect to the new deniability notions, but it is also the first to be tightly secure under standard assumptions; our $$\text {PKEBC}$$ —which is also of independent interest—is the first with ciphertext sizes and encryption and decryption times that grow only linearly in the number of receivers. This is a significant improvement upon the construction given by Maurer et al. (EUROCRYPT ’22), where ciphertext sizes and encryption and decryption times are quadratic in the number of receivers.

In recent years, permisionless blockchains have received a lot of attention both from industry and academia, where substantial effort has been spent to develop consensus protocols that are secure under the assumption that less than half (or a third) of a given resource (e.g., stake or computing power) is controlled by corrupted parties. The security proofs of these consensus protocols usually assume the availability of a network functionality guaranteeing that a block sent by an honest party is received by all honest parties within some bounded time. To obtain an overall protocol that is secure under the same corruption assumption, it is therefore necessary to combine the consensus protocol with a network protocol that achieves this property under that assumption. In practice, however, the underlying network is typically implemented by flooding protocols that are not proven to be secure in the setting where a fraction of the considered total weight can be corrupted. This has led to many so-called eclipse attacks on existing protocols and tailor-made fixes against specific attacks. To close this apparent gap, we present the first practical flooding protocol that provably delivers sent messages to all honest parties after a logarithmic number of steps. We prove security in the setting where all parties are publicly assigned a positive weight and the adversary can corrupt parties accumulating up to a constant fraction of the total weight. This can directly be used in the proof-of-stake setting, but is not limited to it. To prove the security of our protocol, we combine known results about the diameter of Erdős–Rényi graphs with reductions between different types of random graphs. We further show that the efficiency of our protocol is asymptotically optimal. The practicality of our protocol is supported by extensive simulations for different numbers of parties, weight distributions, and corruption strategies. The simulations confirm our theoretical results and show that messages are delivered quickly regardless of the weight distribution, whereas protocols that are oblivious of the parties' weights completely fail if the weights are unevenly distributed. Furthermore, the average message complexity per party of our protocol is within a small constant factor of such a protocol.

Anonymity and authenticity are apparently conflicting goals. Anonymity means hiding a party’s identity whereas authenticity means proving a party’s identity. So how can a set of senders authenticate their messages without revealing their identity? Despite the paradoxical nature of this problem, there exist many cryptographic schemes designed to achieve both goals simultaneously, in some form. This paper provides a composable treatment of communication channels that achieve different forms of anonymity and authenticity. More specifically, three channel functionalities for many senders and one receiver are introduced which provide some trade-off between authenticity and anonymity (of the senders). For each of them, composably realizing it is proved to corresponds to the use of a certain type of cryptographic scheme, namely (1) a new type of scheme which we call bilateral signatures (syntactically related to designated verifier signatures), (2) partial signatures , and (3) ring signatures . This treatment hence provides composable semantics for (game-based) security definitions for these types of schemes. The results of this paper can be interpreted as the dual of the work by Kohlweiss et al. (PETS 2013), where composable notions for anonymous confidential communication were introduced and related to the security definitions of certain types of public-key encryption schemes, and where the treatment of anonymous authenticated communication was stated as an open problem.

This paper introduces a new type of public-key encryption scheme, called Multi-Designated Receiver Signed Public Key Encryption ( M DRS - PKE ), which allows a sender to select a set of designated receivers and both encrypt and sign a message that only these receivers will be able to read and authenticate ( confidentiality and authenticity ). An M DRS - PKE scheme provides several additional security properties which allow for a fundamentally new type of communication not considered before. Namely, it satisfies consistency —a dishonest sender cannot make different receivers receive different messages— off-the-record —a dishonest receiver cannot convince a third party of what message was sent (e.g., by selling their secret key), because dishonest receivers have the ability to forge signatures—and anonymity —parties that are not in the set of designated receivers cannot identify who the sender and designated receivers are. We give a construction of an M DRS - PKE scheme from standard assumptions. At the core of our construction lies yet another new type of public-key encryption scheme, which is of independent interest: Public Key Encryption for Broadcast ( PKEBC ) which provides all the security guarantees of M DRS - PKE schemes, except authenticity. We note that M DRS - PKE schemes give strictly more guarantees than Multi-Designated Verifier Signature ( MDVS ) schemes with privacy of identities. This in particular means that our M DRS - PKE construction yields the first MDVS scheme with privacy of identities from standard assumptions. The only prior construction of such schemes was based on Verifiable Functional Encryption for general circuits (Damgård et al., TCC ’20).

This paper takes a fresh approach to systematically characterizing, comparing, and understanding CCA-type security definitions for public-key encryption (PKE), a topic with a long history. The justification for a concrete security definition X is relative to a benchmark application (e.g. confidential communication): Does the use of a PKE scheme satisfying X imply the security of the application? Because unnecessarily strong definitions may lead to unnecessarily inefficient schemes or unnecessarily strong computational assumptions, security definitions should be as weak as possible, i.e. as close as possible to (but above) the benchmark. Understanding the hierarchy of security definitions, partially ordered by the implication (i.e. at least as strong) relation, is hence important, as is placing the relevant applications as benchmark levels within the hierarchy.CCA-2 security is apparently the strongest notion, but because it is arguably too strong, Canetti, Krawczyk, and Nielsen (Crypto 2003) proposed the relaxed notions of Replayable CCA security (RCCA) as perhaps the weakest meaningful definition, and they investigated the space between CCA and RCCA security by proposing two versions of Detectable RCCA (d-RCCA) security which are meant to ensure that replays of ciphertexts are either publicly or secretly detectable (and hence preventable).The contributions of this paper are three-fold. First, following the work of Coretti, Maurer, and Tackmann (Asiacrypt 2013), we formalize the three benchmark applications of PKE that serve as the natural motivation for security notions, namely the construction of certain types of (possibly replay-protected) confidential channels (from an insecure and an authenticated communication channel). Second, we prove that RCCA does not achieve the confidentiality benchmark and, contrary to previous belief, that the proposed d-RCCA notions are not even relaxations of CCA-2 security. Third, we propose the natural security notions corresponding to the three benchmarks: an appropriately strengthened version of RCCA to ensure confidentiality, as well as two notions for capturing public and secret replay detectability.

We revisit one of the most fundamental hardness amplification constructions, originally proposed by Yao (FOCS 1982). We present a hardness amplification theorem for the direct product of certain games that is simpler, more general, and stronger than previously known hardness amplification theorems of the same kind. Our focus is two-fold. First, we aim to provide close-to-optimal concrete bounds, as opposed to asymptotic ones. Second, in the spirit of abstraction and reusability, our goal is to capture the essence of direct product hardness amplification as generally as possible. Furthermore, we demonstrate how our amplification theorem can be applied to obtain hardness amplification results for non-trivial interactive cryptographic games such as MAC forgery or signature forgery games.

. The task of providing authenticated communication while retaining anonymity requires to achieve two apparently conflicting goals: How can different senders authenticate their messages without revealing their identity? Despite the paradoxical nature of this problem, there exist many cryptographic schemes designed to achieve both goals simultaneously, but the security notions from the literature are mainly game-based. The goal of this paper is to provide new composable security notions for such (public-key) cryptosystems, and it can be interpreted as the dual of the work by Kohlweiss et al. (PETS 2013). We do so by defining possible ideal resources, for many senders and one receiver, which provide some trade-off between authenticity and anonymity (of the senders), and use them to define new composable security notions using the framework of constructive cryptography. Then we systematically review three different protocols and identify which of these notions each satisfies. We consider protocols based on (1) a new type of scheme which we call bilateral signatures (syntactically related to designated verifier signatures), (2) partial signatures (and the related anonymous signatures), and (3) ring signatures .

Updatable encryption (UE) is symmetric encryption which additionally supports key rotation. UE was introduced for scenarios where a user stores encrypted data on a cloud and, in order to mitigate secret key leakage, periodically sends a short update token, which the cloud uses to re-encrypt stored data to a fresh key. A long line of research resulted in a wide variety of security properties UE schemes can provide, including confidentiality, integrity protection, and hiding metadata. Unfortunately, given the complexity and nuances in the definitions, different properties are difficult to compare for non-experts, making it hard to judge which scheme provides the best security-efficiency trade-off for a given application. In this work, we challenge the approach of defining UE as a primitive with a set of properties. As an alternative, we propose to treat UE as an interactive protocol, whose goal is to implement secure outsourced storage, using limited and imperfect resources (such as a small, leakable memory). To facilitate this approach, we introduce a framework that allows to easily formalize different security guarantees and available resources, making security-efficiency trade-offs of UE protocols easy to compare. We believe that our approach opens the way for many constructions of secure storage that are not compatible with the currently defined syntax of UE. Indeed, we propose two new protocols: one for the setting with adversaries who control randomness (an attack vector so far not considered for UE), and one for the setting with adversaries that actively tamper with memory. Both protocols provide stronger confidentiality guarantees than all existing UE schemes.

Proofs of knowledge (PoK) are one of the most fundamental notions in cryptography. The appeal of this notion is that it provides a general template that an application can suitably instantiate by choosing a specific relation. Nonetheless, several important applications have been brought to light, including proofs-of-ownership of files or two-factor authentication, which do not fit the PoK template but naturally appear to be special cases of a more general notion of proofs of knowledge or possession. One would thus expect that their security properties, in particular privacy and soundness, are simply derived as concrete instantiation of a common generalized PoK concept with well understood security semantics. Unfortunately, such a notion does not exist, resulting in a variety of tailor-made security definitions whose plausibility must be checked on a case-by-case basis.

We consider the strong secret key (SK) agreement problem for the satellite communication setting, where a satellite chooses a common binary phase shift keying modulated input for three statistically independent additive white Gaussian noise measurement channels whose outputs are observed by two legitimate transceivers (Alice and Bob) and an eavesdropper (Eve), respectively. Legitimate transceivers have access to an authenticated, noiseless, two-way, and public communication link, so they can exchange multiple rounds of public messages to agree on a SK hidden from Eve. Without loss of essential generality, the noise variances for Alice's and Bob's measurement channels are both fixed to a value $Q>1$, whereas the noise over Eve's measurement channel has a unit variance, so $Q$ represents a channel quality ratio. We show that when both legitimate transceivers apply a one-bit uniform quantizer to their noisy observations before SK agreement, the SK capacity decreases at least quadratically in $Q$.

Two paradigms for secure MPC are synchronous and asynchronous protocols. While synchronous protocols tolerate more corruptions and allow every party to give its input, they are very slow because the speed depends on the conservatively assumed worst-case delay of the network. In contrast, asynchronous protocols allow parties to obtain output as fast as the actual network allows, a property called responsiveness, but unavoidably have lower resilience and parties with slow network connections cannot give input. It is natural to wonder whether it is possible to leverage synchronous MPC protocols to achieve responsiveness, hence obtaining the advantages of both paradigms: full security with responsiveness up to t corruptions, and extended security (full security or security with unanimous abort) with no responsiveness up to T ≥ t corruptions. We settle the question by providing matching feasibility and impossibility results:

We study anonymity of probabilistic encryption (pE) and probabilistic authenticated encryption (pAE). We start by providing concise game-based security definitions capturing anonymity for both pE and pAE, and then show that the commonly used notion of indistinguishability from random ciphertexts (IND$) indeed implies the anonymity notions for both pE and pAE. This is in contrast to a recent work of Chan and Rogaway (Asiacrypt 2019), where it is shown that IND$-secure nonce-based authenticated encryption can only achieve anonymity if a sophisticated transformation is applied. Moreover, we also show that the Encrypt-then-MAC paradigm is anonymity-preserving, in the sense that if both the underlying probabilistic MAC (pMAC) and pE schemes are anonymous, then also the resulting pAE scheme is. Finally, we provide a composable treatment of anonymity using the constructive cryptography framework of Maurer and Renner (ICS 2011). We introduce adequate abstractions modeling various kinds of anonymous communication channels for many senders and one receiver in the presence of an active man-in-the-middle adversary. Then we show that the game-based notions indeed are anonymity-preserving, in the sense that they imply constructions between such anonymous channels, thus generating authenticity and/or confidentiality as expected, but crucially retaining anonymity if present.

Composable security definitions, at times called simulation-based definitions, provide strong security guarantees that hold in any context. However, they are also met with some skepticism due to many impossibility results; goals such as commitments and zero-knowledge that are achievable in a stand-alone sense were shown to be unachievable composably (without a setup) since provably no efficient simulator exists. In particular, in the context of adaptive security, the so-called "simulator commitment problem" arises: once a party gets corrupted, an efficient simulator is unable to be consistent with its pre-corruption outputs. A natural question is whether such impossibility results are unavoidable or only artifacts of frameworks being too restrictive. In this work, we propose a novel type of composable security statement that evades the commitment problem. Our new type is able to express the composable guarantees of schemes that previously did not have a clear composable understanding. To this end, we leverage the concept of system specifications in the Constructive Cryptography framework, capturing the conjunction of several interval-wise guarantees, each specifying the guarantees between two events. We develop the required theory and present the corresponding new composition theorem. We present three applications of our theory. First, we show in the context of symmetric encryption with adaptive corruption how our notion naturally captures the expected confidentiality guarantee—the messages remain confidential until either party gets corrupted—and that it can be achieved by any standard semantically secure scheme (negating the need for non-committing encryption). Second, we present a composable formalization of (so far only known to be standalone secure) commitment protocols, which is instantiable without a trusted setup like a CRS. We show it to be sufficient for being used in coin tossing over the telephone, one of the early intuitive applications of commitments. Third, we reexamine a result by Hofheinz, Matt, and Maurer [Asiacrypt'15] implying that IND-ID-CPA security is not the right notion for identity-based encryption, unmasking this claim as an unnecessary framework artifact.

This paper proposes a simple synchronous composable security framework as an instantiation of the Constructive Cryptography framework, aiming to capture minimally, without unnecessary artefacts, exactly what is needed to state synchronous security guarantees. The objects of study are specifications (i.e., sets) of systems, and traditional security properties like consistency and validity can naturally be understood as specifications, thus unifying composable and property-based definitions. The framework's simplicity is in contrast to current composable frameworks for synchronous computation which are built on top of an asynchronous framework (e.g. the UC framework), thus not only inheriting artefacts and complex features used to handle asynchronous communication, but adding additional overhead to capture synchronous communication. As a second, independent contribution we demonstrate how secure (synchronous) multi-party computation protocols can be understood as constructing a computer that allows a set of parties to perform an arbitrary, on-going computation. An interesting aspect is that the instructions of the computation need not be fixed before the protocol starts but can also be determined during an on-going computation, possibly depending on previous outputs.

The Concordium Platform is designed to be fast, secure and cost-effective. Concordium’s innovative identity layer provides on-chain identity, compliance-centric payments and enhanced privacy for users, while also allowing for the de-anonymization of network participants. Concordium’s two-layer consensus protocol consists of a Nakamoto-style consensus blockchain and a finality layer for fast confirmation of transactions. Our sharding design enables high transaction throughput and private shards for business use cases and sensitive data. Concordium also enables interoperability and communication between shards and between Concordium and other blockchains. Concordium has designed new languages for writing smart contract code that make development easier and smart contracts more reliable. The Concordium Platform also features a transparent incentive structure with cost-effective transactions and predictable fees.

Topology-Hiding Computation (THC) allows a set of parties to securely compute a function over an incomplete network without revealing information on the network topology. Since its introduction in TCC’15 by Moran et al., the research on THC has focused on reducing the communication complexity, allowing larger graph classes, and tolerating stronger corruption types. All of these results consider a fully synchronous model with a known upper bound on the maximal delay of all communication channels. Unfortunately, in any realistic setting this bound has to be extremely large, which makes all fully synchronous protocols inefficient. In the literature on multi-party computation, this is solved by considering the fully asynchronous model. However, THC is unachievable in this model (and even hard to define), leaving even the definition of a meaningful model as an open problem. The contributions of this paper are threefold. First, we introduce a meaningful model of unknown and random communication delays for which THC is both definable and achievable. The probability distributions of the delays can be arbitrary for each channel, but one needs to make the (necessary) assumption that the delays are independent. The existing fully-synchronous THC protocols do not work in this setting and would, in particular, leak information about the topology. Second, in the model with trusted stateless hardware boxes introduced at Eurocrypt’18 by Ball et al., we present a THC protocol that works for any graph class. Third, we explore what is achievable in the standard model without trusted hardware and present a THC protocol for specific graph types (cycles and trees) secure under the DDH assumption. The speed of all protocols scales with the actual (unknown) delay times, in contrast to all previously known THC protocols whose speed is determined by the assumed upper bound on the network delay.

Broadcast is a primitive which allows a specific party to distribute a message consistently among n parties, even if up to t parties exhibit malicious behaviour. In the classical model with a complete network of bilateral authenticated channels, the seminal result of Pease et al. [Pease et al., 1980] shows that broadcast is achievable if and only if t < n/3. There are two generalizations suggested for the broadcast problem - with respect to the adversarial model and the communication model. Fitzi and Maurer [Fitzi and Maurer, 1998] consider a (non-threshold) general adversary that is characterized by the subsets of parties that could be corrupted, and show that broadcast can be realized from bilateral channels if and only if the union of no three possible corrupted sets equals the entire set of n parties. On the other hand, Considine et al. [Considine et al., 2005] extend the standard model of bilateral channels with the existence of b-minicast channels that allow to locally broadcast among any subset of b parties; the authors show that in this enhanced model of communication, secure broadcast tolerating up to t corrupted parties is possible if and only if t < (b-1)/(b+1)n. These generalizations are unified in the work by Raykov [Raykov P., 2015], where a tight condition on the possible corrupted sets is presented such that broadcast is achievable from a complete set of b-minicasts. This paper investigates the achievability of broadcast in general networks, i.e., networks where only some subsets of minicast channels may be available, thereby addressing open problems posed in [Jaffe et al., 2012; Raykov P., 2015]. To that end, we propose a hierarchy over all possible general adversaries, and identify for each class of general adversaries 1) a set of minicast channels that are necessary to achieve broadcast and 2) a set of minicast channels that are sufficient to achieve broadcast. In particular, this allows us to derive bounds on the amount of b-minicasts that are necessary and that suffice towards constructing broadcast in general b-minicast networks.