Е. Кутафина) is a coeducational and public research university located in Moscow, Russia. It was founded on 1931. MSAL was renamed after Oleg Kutafin in 2012 and was then known as Kutafin University. Its current rector is Viktor Blazheev.
The article provides a legal assessment of a new direction in the creative industry - live action quests. A classification of quests is depending from environment they are held (online and offline games), location (at the organizer's premises; on the city streets; in shopping centers, offices); and the age of the players. The legal status of players and organizers is defined. The prohibition on children under 6 years of age (including those accompanied by parents) from participating in quest rooms is justified, as establishment of a procedure for verifying age of minors to prevent the dissemination of information harmful to the health and development of minors. There should be no age limit for players. Restrictions on game participation may be based on health status, the type of quest (contact or non-contact), and the level of exposure. It is proposed that the essential terms of the contract for the organization and conduct of live action quests include the terms regarding the subject, place and time of the event, the rules of the game and physical contact with the actors-animators and other players, security, confidentiality, and payment. The limitations of physical and psychological impact of live-action actors on game participants are justified. The contract for organizing and conducting a live action quest must be concluded in writing, with the legally stipulated consequence of non-compliance being invalidity (nullity). To protect players, regardless of their age, the storage period for game recordings from video cameras must be at least fourteen days from the date of the quest. A player's consent to deliberate physical and psychological abuse during a quest does not exempt the organizer from civil liability. In emergency situations, the organizer must provide multiple ways to stop the game. It is proposed to regulate contractual relations in the quest industry not by approving new standards, but by creating norms at the federal law level. Research methods of the author are: general academic methods, as well as a systemic and logical analysis of Russian legislation, business practices and scholar literature.
The relevance: Currently, there is a lack of up-to-date comparative legal studies in Russian academia on the topic of involuntary hospitalization and the provision of psychiatric care. At the same time, there is a need to bring Russian involuntary hospitalization procedures into line with modern international human rights standards. The main goal: To conduct a comparison of different legal systems to identify institutions and mechanisms necessary for improving domestic legislation. The problems under consideration: The effectiveness of procedural mechanisms in carrying out involuntary hospitalization, and the observance of human rights during involuntary medical interventions. The methods used: General scientific (dialectical, systemic, functional) and specifically legal (comparative legal, formal dogmatic, and the method of legal modeling). Conclusions: Different approaches to the division of competence between administrative and judicial bodies were identified. According to the author, some of the legal mechanisms applied in foreign law may make it possible to create a more flexible and adaptable system for hospitalization, one that can consider the characteristics and needs of many people in need of specialized care.
This article analyzes the provisions of Federal Law No. 362-FL of 29 October 2024 regarding the introduction of amendments to Articles 214.1 and 219.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. This article contains key features of the taxable income category, considers the specifics of taxation of securities exchange transactions and the procedure for replacing securities introduced by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 677 of 8 August 2024. The result of the study is the thesis on the need to revise the approach to taxation of transactions of equal exchange that do not create economic benefits for either party.
The practice of Russian courts, developed over 30 years of application of Part II of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, has led to the emergence of the phenomenon of security ownership. In buyout leases and sale and purchase agreements with a clause reserving title for the seller, the owner's title serves for the creditor only as security for the debtor's performance of the debt payment obligation. Considering this, when regulating security ownership, Russian courts are increasingly resorting to the application of pledge law rules by analogy, arguing that the legal status of the pledgor and the creditor using the title security is identical. Security ownership, existing within certain contractual structures, inevitably raises the question of its content and the admissibility of applying the provisions of Section II of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to regulate it. This article attempts to analyze the impact of the security function of ownership on the application of general rules for determining the owner of movable property arising from specification.
The article is devoted to the practice of using special psychological knowledge in disputes about children. When protecting the rights of guardians, adoptive parents and children, there is a need to conduct a psychological study to resolve issues of key importance. In the article, the author considers the requirements for a social and psychological examination of adoptive parents and guardians, lists the possible resources and risks of accepting an adopted child into a family. Based on the results of such an examination, a conclusion is drawn up. The author names typical mistakes in such conclusions, gives examples of preparing conclusions of a specialist psychologist.
