Patients with serious illnesses and short prognoses often experience depression and suicidal ideation. Traditional antidepressants are limited by delayed onset, creating a need for rapidly acting therapies. In this Palliative Care Rounds, we examine the evidence for ketamine/esketamine's efficacy as antidepressants, including evidence specific to people with serious illnesses. In psychiatric studies, intravenous ketamine produces rapid (1-24 hours), moderate-to-large antidepressant effects lasting one to two weeks, with a number needed to treat of three in the first week. Esketamine nasal spray demonstrates similar early efficacy and is U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment-resistant depression and major depression with suicidal ideation. Evidence in serious illness is limited to several perioperative cancer trials and small open-label studies, which show short-term reductions in depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation but do not address long-term management or maintenance dosing. Safety across serious illness studies is generally favorable, with transient dissociation, hypertension, and somnolence the most common adverse effects; serious adverse events remain rare. Ketamine and esketamine offer the strongest evidence among rapid-acting antidepressants and may be preferred when urgent symptom relief is needed. However, rigorous psychiatric trials in serious illness are lacking. Clinicians should consider prognosis, access to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies-certified esketamine programs or equivalent regulatory frameworks outside the U.S., and the need for an appropriate maintenance regimen when integrating ketamine into palliative care depression management.

Most palliative care (PC) physicians will change jobs over the course of their career, yet few supports exist to guide them through this often unfamiliar process. Job transitions frequently elicit stress and uncertainty, as individuals balance personal and professional priorities, navigate complex negotiations, and assume the inherent risks of pursuing new opportunities. Yet, when approached intentionally, a job transition can also be a transformative process that allows for self-discovery, cultivation of new skills and connections, and reshaping of one's professional identity. This article, written by a team of PC physicians who have made job transitions themselves, offers 10 tips for navigating this professional step successfully. With emphases on authentic communication, skilled mentorship, relationship building, and exploration of local culture-the article offers practical advice to help PC physicians navigate a job transition confidently, while staying grounded in their personal values and the work they find most meaningful.

Depression is common in serious illness, yet traditional antidepressants have a delayed onset. Psychostimulants offer potentially rapid symptom relief, but their evidence base for depression, especially in medically complex patients, remains unclear. In this Palliative Care Rounds, we review the evidence for the use of psychostimulants as monotherapy or augmentation for major depressive disorder, including trials enrolling patients with cancer or other serious illnesses. Evidence for monotherapy is weak: meta-analyses of small, methodologically limited trials suggest modest benefit compared with placebo. Augmentation studies demonstrate statistically significant but clinically small effects. Data on people with serious illnesses is limited to a small number of heterogeneous trials with inconsistent findings. Overall, psychostimulants have limited evidence for depression in serious illness, particularly as monotherapy. Given evidence for alternative rapid-acting interventions, such as ketamine/esketamine or second-generation antipsychotic augmentation, psychostimulants should be used sparingly and reserved for specific scenarios (e.g., comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or prior robust response).

Depression in serious illness is common, disabling, and often requires rapid improvement. Traditional antidepressants may take weeks to work, whereas second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have evidence for faster onset and robust augmentation effects in general psychiatric populations. In this Palliative Care Rounds, we review the general psychiatric and serious illness-specific evidence for the use of SGAs as monotherapy and augmentation therapy for depression. In the psychiatric literature, SGA augmentation improves response and remission rates (odds ratios 1.34-2.93; needed to treat 7-13), with onset of improvement within 1-2 weeks. Monotherapy is less well tolerated and not guideline-recommended. No randomized controlled trials have evaluated SGAs specifically for depression in serious illness, but numerous cancer trials support their safety for nausea, appetite, and other symptoms. Despite the absence of serious illness-specific psychiatric trials, SGAs have the strongest evidence base among augmentation options and may offer meaningful benefits when prognosis or symptom severity necessitates rapid improvement. Low-dose augmentation should be considered early, rather than only after multiple failed antidepressants, particularly when SGAs can also target co-occurring physical symptoms relevant to palliative care.

Limited data exist on factors associated with early quality of life (QOL) response to palliative care (PC) in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We conducted a secondary analysis from two randomized clinical trials of PC versus usual care in adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing HCT. We measured patient-reported QOL, physical and psychological symptoms, and coping (categorized as approach-oriented and avoidant) at time of HCT admission, 2-weeks, 3- and 6- months post-HCT. PC clinicians completed weekly surveys documenting PC domains addressed. We defined early QOL response to PC as change in FACT-BMT Total score from HCT admission to week 2 and used the median split to define "high" responders. 252 participants were included in analyses. The median change in QOL from HCT admission to week 2 was -10.7 (range: -77.0, +52.0). Minoritized race (OR=3.2, CI=[1.7,6.3], p<0.001), lower baseline QOL (OR=0.97, CI=[0.96,0.99], p<0.001), higher physical (OR=1.02, CI=[1.0,1.04], p=0.004) and PTSD symptoms (OR=1.04, CI=[1.01,1.07], p=0.008) were associated with being a high PC responder. High PC responders reported greater use of approach-oriented coping at week 2 (D=2.5, CI=[0.9,4.1], p=0.002), 3 months (D=1.7, CI=[0.1,3.3], p=0.04), and 6 months post-HCT (D=2.6, CI=[0.8,4.4], p=0.003). Based on PC clinician surveys during HCT, high responders' PC visits focused on coping, illness/HCT education, and symptom education, compared to low responders' visits which focused on symptom management. These findings provide insights into factors associated with early QOL response to PC in HCT and help identify those most likely to benefit in real world practice. The clinical trial were registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02207322, NCT03641378)

PURPOSE Historically, patients with hematologic malignancies are referred to palliative care less often and later in the disease trajectory than those with solid tumors. Recent evidence demonstrates the benefit of early, integrated inpatient palliative care (PC) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving chemotherapy at academic centers. The current study evaluated the feasibility of implementing standardized early palliative care services (PCS) during hospitalization for AML treatment in a community setting. METHODS Starting June 2018, automated consultations for PCS were incorporated into clinical pathways to encourage early, integrated services for patients receiving chemotherapy for AML with an expected hospital stay of 4-6 weeks. Expectations were established that consultations would be performed within 72 hours of request; patients would have two visits per week by a palliative care clinician and at least one visit by a member of the interdisciplinary team. To measure the feasibility of this intervention, data on number of patients who received palliative care consultation and time to palliative care consultation were compared with institutional historical controls. RESULTS On the basis of retrospective chart review, the postintervention group (n = 21) had greater PCS compared with historical controls (n = 28; 95% v 36%). The average number of PC team member visits per patient was significantly greater after the intervention: PC clinicians (1.04-8.05, P < .001), chaplains (1.3-3.3, P = .0085), and social workers (1.0-4.3, P < .001). Of those patients who received PCS, 74% had their initial palliative medicine consultation within 3 days of a clinician's order and 100% within 4 days. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing standardized integration of PCS for patients with AML hospitalized for treatment in a community setting.

12011 Background: Patients (pts) with high HCT-Comorbidity Index scores (HCT-CI of ≥3), older age (≥65 years), and/or who are frail per gait speed (<0.8 meters/second) have increased morbidity and mortality after allo-HCT compared to younger and healthier counterparts. We report the phase II analysis (PIIA) and interim phase III primary outcome analysis (PIIIA) of a seamless phase II/III prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted at 11 transplant centers to test new approaches to improve quality of life (QOL) in this population. Methods: Phase II compared specialist-administered supportive and palliative care (SPC), patient-administered management of comorbidities (MC, e.g. physical exercise, stress reduction, etc), both (SPC+MC), and usual care (UC) for change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT) QOL scores from baseline to day 90 (D90). Pts deceased prior to D90 were assigned FACT-BMT score=0. The winning phase II arm moved forward versus UC in phase III. Results: PIIA was done after enrolling 35 pts to each of the 4 study arms. Calculating the difference between FACT-BMT scores on D90 minus baseline, excluding missing data, indicated that only SPC resulted in a small improvement in QOL compared to either MC or SPC+MC (Table); hence SPC was the winning phase II arm. The PIIIA was conducted after enrolling 158 SPC pts and 153 UC pts. The SPC and UC arms were well balanced with median age (both 68 years), HCT-CI ≥3 (49% vs 55%), frailty per gait speed (13% vs 12%), female sex (41% vs 34%), non-white race (9.5% vs 11.5%), and Hispanic or unreported ethnicity (7.7% vs 5.7%), respectively. After median follow-up of 362 days, 45 pts had died in each arm. The mean QOL difference between D90 and baseline was 2.83 for SPC and 4.27 for UC (difference of differences, -1.44, 95% CI of difference, -5.03 to 2.14, p=0.43). Fitting a generalized linear model that included baseline, D30, and D90 values and testing the null hypothesis that the slope of scores differs between SPC and UC resulted in p=0.85. Using the Kaplan Meier method, no difference in survival was observed across arms (HR 1.13 [0.75-1.73]). Conclusions: Specialist-administered palliative care showed no meaningful improvement in QOL, nor a survival advantage, compared to usual care in frail, older and comorbid allo-HCT recipients, resulting in the cessation of this Phase II/III trial. Analysis of the whole patient population for primary and secondary outcomes is in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT03870750 . Change in FACT-BMT (D90 value minus baseline value) comparing the 4 arms of phase II. Group Mean difference (sd) Median difference (range) SPC (n=28) -2.93 (28.52) 0.25 (-102 to 38.22) CM (n=18) -18.37 (33.80) -9.50 (-98.33 to 11) SPC+CM (n=27) -15.76 (32.69) -7.67 (-90 to 32)

INTRODUCTION While prognostic understanding (PU) is important for all patients (pts) considering hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), it may be particularly important for older (>65 years), medically infirm, and/or frail pts deciding whether to undergo allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT). This abstract reports on PU and concordance with transplant physician (hereafter MD) PU for pts participating in an ongoing seamless, phase II-III randomized clinical trial (ACE-BMT) comparing 4-arms: a pt-administered comorbidity management intervention (CM), specialist-administered palliative care (PC), a combined arm of CM and PC to standard of care. Here we report preliminary data on the concordance between pt and MD PU on the chance of cure 1-year (yr) post allo-HCT. METHODS Pt PU was compared to MD PU (gold standard) to determine concordance. MD and pt answers were compared on a single validated question asked at enrollment to the study (typically 2 weeks prior to HCT). Both pts and MD's estimated the chance of cure 1 yr after allo-HCT by selecting one of six possible response options: very good (more than 90%), good (75-90%), better than 50% (50-74%), worse than 50% (25-49%), bad (10-24%) or very bad (less than 10%). PU was “concordant” or “accurate” if MD and pt selected the same response option. Pts with discordant PU were labeled “pessimistic” if the pt selected a response option with a lower chance of cure than the MD (and “optimistic” if a higher chance). Response options were further simplified to greater than or less than 50% chance of cure and MD and pt PU were compared again. Descriptive statistics, chi-square for categorical and t-tests for continuous variables were used. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between pt prognostic concordance and pt socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS All pts consented to date were included (n=358), except those who did not answer the prognosis question (n=61). 54.2% (n=194) had HCT-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) of ≥3, 67.9% (n=243) were older than 65 yrs and 4.5% (n=16) were frail, defined by walk speed <0.8 m/s. Median age was 68 yrs (range 20-80). 39.7% (n=141) were female. 89.9% (n=322) identified as White, 4.2% (n=15) Asian, and 1% each as Black/African American and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander. 5.3% (n=19) identified Hispanic. 11.5% (n=44) had high school education or less. 54.1% (n=183) made less than $100,000/yr. 40.1% (n=136) had acute myelogenous leukemia, 25.4% (n=86) had high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and 10.6% (n=36) had a myeloproliferative cancer. 72.1% (n=245) had matched, 82.5% (n=283) unrelated and 95.0% (n=36) peripheral blood allo-HCT. 9% (n=31) had KPS of 100%, 35% (n=121) KPS 90%, and 47.5% (n=147) KPS 80%. Pts reported having a very good, good, better than 50%, worse than 50% and bad/very bad chance of cure 1 yr post allo-HCTL 34.4% (n=123), 30.7% (n=110), 26.0% (n=93), 7.3% (n=26) and 1.7% (n=6), respectively. 91.1% (n=326) of pts felt they had a >50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. MD answers were missing for 159/358 (44.4%) pts. MDs reported pt had a very good, good, better than 50%, worse than 50% and bad/very bad chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT, 3.0% (n=6), 6.5% (n=13), 52.8% (n=105), 35.7% (n=71) and 2% (n=4) respectively. 62.3% (n=124) of MDs felt the pt had a >50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. For the subset of pts with MD prognostic data (n=199), pt's PU was concordant 20.6% (n=41) of the time when compared across all 6 response options. Overall, 71.9% (n=143) of pts erred toward optimism, while 7.5% (n=15) of pts were pessimistic. 60.8% of MD and pts agreed on prognosis when dichotomized to better or worse than 50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. Prognostic concordance was not significantly associated with any pt socio-demographic factors, HCT-CI or KPS via descriptive statistics or regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective randomized trial focusing on a population of older, medically infirm, and/or frail pts receiving allo-HCT, pts' PU was not concordant with MD prognosis approximately 80% of the time. While some pts were pessimistic, the majority overestimated the likelihood they would be cured of disease compared to MD estimates. Future studies should investigate the true accuracy of both MD and pt prognosis, as well as how to improve communication about prognosis and pt PU (if inaccurate based on best available information) prior to HCT.

Background: Historically, there have been perceptions that engagement with palliative care (PC) services may preclude potentially curative but high-risk operations. As such, we sought to investigate the relationship between specialty PC consultation and the care trajectory of surgical patients. We hypothesized that PC consultation would be associated with increased frequency of nonoperative treatments being chosen among surgical inpatients.Design: All general surgery and general surgery subspecialty patients receiving PC consultation at a single tertiary academic medical center from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Surgical operations were stratified as "elevated risk" in accordance with 2014 American Heart Association guidelines. Retrospective chart review was performed, and comparisons were made with univariable statistics.Results: We identified a total of 729 patients who received specialty PC consultation, 159 of whom were admitted to a surgical service. PC was actively involved in consultation for surgical decision making in 27% (43/159) of these encounters. PC assistance with surgical decision making was associated with a greater incidence of elevated-risk operative procedures during admission compared with patients without presurgical PC consultation (OR 3.29 [2.51, 7.16]). There was no association between PC involvement with surgical decision making and odds of discharge to hospice (OR 0.42 [0.18, 1.51]) nor death during admission (OR 0.66 [0.21, 2.10]).Conclusions: We found that specialty PC involvement in surgical decision making does not preclude the pursuit of disease-directed surgical treatment. Contrary to our hypothesis, our single institutional data demonstrate that early PC consultation can be synergistic with surgical disease management and does not preclude elevated-risk operative care.

Mental health issues are widespread and significant among individuals with serious illness. Among patients receiving palliative care (PC), psychiatric comorbidities are common and impact patient quality of life. Despite their prevalence, PC clinicians face challenges in effectively addressing the intricate relationship between medical and psychiatric disorders due to their complex, intertwined and bidirectionally influential nature. This article, created collaboratively with a team of psychiatric-palliative care experts, is the second in a two-part series examining the bidirectional relationship between medical and psychiatric illness in PC. This article explores 10 prevalent psychiatric manifestations associated with severe illness and its treatment. Building upon the first article, which focused on 10 common physical manifestations of psychiatric illness among patients receiving PC, these two articles advocate for an integrated approach to PC that prioritizes mental and emotional wellbeing across the continuum of serious illness.

Purpose of Review Palliative care (PC) psychiatry is a growing subspecialty focusing on improving the mental health of those with serious medical conditions and their caregivers. This review elucidates the current practice and ongoing evolution of PC psychiatry. Recent Findings PC psychiatry leverages training and clinical practices from both PC and psychiatry, addressing a wide range of needs, including enhanced psychiatric care for patients with serious medical illness, PC access for patients with medical needs in psychiatric settings, and PC-informed psychiatric approaches for individuals with treatment-refractory serious mental illness. PC psychiatry is practiced by a diverse workforce comprising hospice and palliative medicine–trained psychiatrists, psycho-oncologists, geriatric psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, and non-psychiatrist PC clinicians. As a result, PC psychiatry faces challenges in defining its operational scope. The manuscript outlines the growth, current state, and prospects of PC psychiatry. It examines its roles across various healthcare settings, including medical, integrated care, and psychiatric environments, highlighting the unique challenges and opportunities in each. Summary PC psychiatry is a vibrant and growing subspecialty of psychiatry that must be operationalized to continue its developmental trajectory. There is a need for a distinct professional identity for PC psychiatry, strategies to navigate administrative and regulatory hurdles, and greater support for novel clinical, educational, and research initiatives.

We compared the risks of re-revision and mortality between two-stage and single-stage revision surgeries among patients with infected primary hip arthroplasty. Patients with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of their primary arthroplasty revised with single-stage or two-stage procedure in England and Wales between 2003 and 2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry. We used Poisson regression with restricted cubic splines to compute hazard ratios (HRs) at different postoperative periods. The total number of revisions and re-revisions undergone by patients was compared between the two strategies. In total, 535 primary hip arthroplasties were revised with single-stage procedure (1,525 person-years) and 1,605 with two-stage procedure (5,885 person-years). All-cause re-revision was higher following single-stage revision, especially in the first three months (HR at 3 months = 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 3.43), p = 0.009). The risks were comparable thereafter. Re-revision for PJI was higher in the first three postoperative months for single-stage revision and waned with time (HR at 3 months = 1.81 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.68), p = 0.003; HR at 6 months = 1.25 (95% CI 0.71 to 2.21), p = 0.441; HR at 12 months = 0.94 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.63), p = 0.819). Patients initially managed with a single-stage revision received fewer revision operations (mean 1.3 (SD 0.7) vs 2.2 (SD 0.6), p < 0.001). Mortality rates were comparable between these two procedures (29/10,000 person-years vs 33/10,000). The risk of unplanned re-revision was lower following two-stage revision, but only in the early postoperative period. The lower overall number of revision procedures associated with a single-stage revision strategy and the equivalent mortality rates to two-stage revision are reassuring. With appropriate counselling, single-stage revision is a viable option for the treatment of hip PJI.

Background: As a key component of advance care planning, serious illness conversations form a core intervention in palliative care. To achieve effective serious illness conversations, acknowledgment and inclusion of patient sense of self and identity are critical. However, no framework exists to describe how goals, values, and choices relate to patient identity. This conceptual gap hinders the advancement of palliative care education and practice.Objective: This philosophical investigation aimed to explicate two items: first, a novel conceptual framework for serious illness conversations; second, a structured approach to optimize these conversations within the palliative care clinical context.Methods: A philosophical and theoretical analysis was performed within an interdisciplinary context, by scholars in palliative care, medical humanities, philosophy, and bioethics. Key literature in psychology, qualitative research on the experience of serious illness, medical ethics, and choice architecture in medical decision-making were reviewed, and a structured conceptual and narrative analysis was performed.Results: An original and innovative identity-centered conceptual framework for serious illness conversations was developed. The framework consists of a four-step, reproducible approach: (1) attend to patient narrative identity, (2) identify values, (3) cocreate goals, and (4) actively promote choices. In short: attend, identify, create, and promote (AICP).Discussion: By using this conceptual framework and four-step approach, clinicians can accomplish goal-concordant serious illness care and build rich clinical relationships that foster trust and goodwill.

BackgroundPatients undergoing HSCT and their caregivers endure substantial psychological distress during the transplant hospitalization. Prior single-center studies established the feasibility and promising efficacy of integrating palliative care during the HSCT hospitalization. However, data regarding the efficacy of this care model across diverse care settings are lacking.MethodsWe conducted a multi-site randomized trial among 360 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT and their caregivers at three academic institutions. Patients without an interested caregiver were still eligible to participate. Patients and their caregivers were randomly assigned to an inpatient palliative care intervention (n=180) versus usual care (n=180), stratified by study site and HSCT type. Intervention participants met with a palliative care clinician at least twice weekly during the HSCT hospitalization to address their symptoms. Patients assigned to usual care received all supportive care measures provided by the HSCT team. We assessed quality of life (QOL; (Patient: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Bone Marrow Transplant; Caregiver: Caregiver Oncology QOL questionnaire), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and patients’ post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist) at baseline, week-2, 3, and 6 months post-HSCT. The primary endpoint was patients’ QOL at week-2 during the HSCT hospitalization when patients typically experience their QOL nadir. We used linear regression, adjusting for baseline scores, to evaluate the effect of the intervention on participant-reported outcomes at week-2. We used linear mixed effect models to assess the effect of the intervention on study outcomes longitudinally across all time points.ResultsWe enrolled 69.5% (360/518) of eligible patients and 186 caregivers between October 2018 and July 2022. Compared to those receiving usual care, patients receiving the intervention reported better QOL (B=4.6, P<0.001), and lower depression (B=-0.9, P=0.042) and PTSD symptoms (B=-2.2, P=0.014) at week-2. Patient-reported anxiety did not differ significantly between the two groups at week-2. Intervention caregivers reported lower anxiety symptoms (B=-0.97, P=0.042) at week-2, but no differences in QOL or depression symptoms. In the longitudinal analyses, patients receiving the intervention reported lower PTSD symptoms up to six months post-HSCT (B=-0.81, P=0.020). All other participant-reported outcomes did not differ longitudinally between the two groups.ConclusionsPalliative care led to substantial improvements in patients’ QOL, depression and PTSD symptoms, as well as caregiver anxiety during HSCT hospitalization with sustained effects on patients’ PTSD symptoms up to six months post-HSCT.

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) struggle with immense physical and psychological symptom burden, which negatively affect their quality of life (QOL) throughout the continuum of illness. These patients are often faced with substantial prognostic uncertainty as they navigate their illness course, which further complicates their medical decision making, especially at the end of life (EOL). Consequently, patients with HM often endure intensive medical care at the EOL, including frequent hospitalization and intensive care unit admissions, and they often die in the hospital. Our EOL health care delivery models are not well suited to meet the unique needs of patients with HMs. Although studies have established the role of specialty palliative care for improving QOL and EOL outcomes in patients with solid tumors, numerous disease-, clinician-, and system-based barriers prevail, limiting the integration of palliative care for patients with HMs. Nonetheless, multiple studies have emerged over the past decade identifying the role of palliative care integration in patients with various HMs, resulting in improvements in patient-reported QOL, symptom burden, and psychological distress, as well as EOL care. Importantly, these studies have also identified active components of specialty palliative care interventions, including strategies to promote adaptive coping especially in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Future work can leverage the knowledge gained from specialty palliative care integration to develop and test primary palliative care interventions by training clinicians caring for patients with HMs to incorporate these strategies into their clinical practice.

Abstract Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC) increases the risk of physical and cognitive decline as well as side effects impacting quality of life. However, we lack a holistic understanding of the timing and spectrum of ADT-related side effects. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of using home-based, continuous passive monitoring of daily life functioning, symptom surveys, physical performance, and cognitive testing in patients with PC beginning ADT. We assessed enrollment, passive monitoring uptake, retention, sensor data coverage, and data completion. Passive monitoring included infrared motion sensors (activity), door contact sensors (time out-of-home), watch (activity/sleep), bed mat (sleep), biometric scale (weight), electronic pillbox (medication adherence), and computer-use software (computer habits). We assessed health events and treatment-related symptoms (weekly online survey), physical functioning (short physical performance battery, timed up-and-go test), and cognitive functioning (online cognitive test). We enrolled 17 patients of 52 approached (median age, 73 years); 24 chose not to participate primarily due to concerns of burden (n=10, 42%) and feeling overwhelmed (n=5; 21%). Retention over 14 months was 82% (n=3 withdrawals). Weekly survey completion was 79%. Data coverage for passive monitoring ranged from 55% for watch-based sleep to 98% for motion sensor activity. Testing visit completion across 6 months was 93%; cognitive test completion was 98%. In sum, passive monitoring of daily functioning, symptom surveys, physical performance, and cognitive testing is feasible among older patients with PC beginning ADT. Future research will integrate symptoms, functioning, and health events to examine longitudinal variations in health during ADT.

Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies experience a substantial decline in their quality of life (QOL) and psychological health during their hospitalization for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Early single center studies established the feasibility and promising preliminary efficacy of integrating palliative care during the HSCT hospitalization. However, data to test the efficacy of this care model across diverse care settings are lacking. Methods: We conducted a multi-site randomized trial among 360 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT at three academic institutions. Patients were randomly assigned to an inpatient palliative care intervention (n= 180) versus usual care (n=180), stratified by study site and type of HSCT. Intervention participants met with a palliative care clinician at least twice weekly during the HSCT hospitalization to address their physical and psychological symptoms. Patients assigned to usual care received all supportive care measures provided by the HSCT team and could be seen by palliative care upon request. We assessed patient QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Bone Marrow Transplant), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist), symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-Revised), and fatigue (FACT-Fatigue, higher scores indicate lower fatigue) at baseline and week-2 during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was QOL at week-2 during the HSCT hospitalization when patients typically experience their QOL nadir during HSCT. We used analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline scores, to evaluate the effect of the intervention on patient-reported outcomes at week-2. Results: We enrolled 69.5% (360/518) of eligible patients (mean age = 55.4 (SD=12.5), 61.9% male, 76.6% White, 23.4% racial minorities, 8.7% Hispanic ethnicity, and 50.2% underwent allogeneic HSCT) between October 2018 and July 2022. Compared to those receiving usual care, participants receiving the inpatient palliative care intervention reported better QOL (95.5 vs. 89.3, P<0.001), and lower depression (5.9 vs. 6.9, P=0.041) and PTSD symptoms (26.0 vs. 28.2, P = 0.022) at week-2. Intervention participants also reported lower symptom burden (35.3 vs. 40.1, P=0.018) and better fatigue scores (28.6 vs. 25.6, p=0.014) compared to those assigned to usual care at week-2 during HSCT hospitalization. Anxiety symptoms (HADS-A) did not demonstrate a measurable difference between the two groups at week-2 during HSCT. Conclusions: In this multi-site randomized clinical trial, inpatient palliative care led to substantial improvements in patients' QOL, depression and PTSD symptoms, symptom burden, and fatigue during HSCT hospitalization compared to usual care. Integrated palliative care should be considered a new standard of care for patients hospitalized for HSCT.

Specialist palliative care provides additional support to facilitate living well with a serious illness, like cancer, even while pursuing disease-directed therapy. For patients with hematologic malignancies, integrated specialist palliative care improves symptom burden, mood, and quality of life, with benefits even extending to caregivers. Despite this, patients with hematologic malignancies continue to have significant unmet palliative care needs and typically access palliative care late in their disease trajectories, if at all. In this paper, we will define specialist palliative care and review its benefits for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will discuss the unmet palliative care needs of this patient population and the barriers to integrating palliative care and oncologic care. Finally, we will explore innovations and areas of future research to enhance and optimize palliative care integration into usual cancer care treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will explore the importance of ongoing clinical trials that are examining the correct "dose" of palliative care; the use of technology and telehealth; and the use of novel treatments for this patient population. Together, we will consider innovative avenues to provide palliative care to patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers.