[Purposes]This study aims to depict the current international landscape of open peer review(OPR)practices in academic journals through a large-scale survey and analysis.It seeks to identify the basic characteristics of journals adopting OPR,as well as the extent and strategies of OPR implementation.The goal is to provide an empirical reference for the adoption of such practices by journals in China.[Methods]The study is based on a sample library of 1111 OPR journals and 11110 articles published within them.An investigation and statistical analysis were conducted on their publication information,academic impact,and specific practices concerning the openness of the review cycle,reviewer identities,and review content.[Findings]The results indicate a high concentration of OPR practices in Europe,within commercial publishing houses,and in the disciplines of medicine and health sciences.The adoption of OPR is primarily led by non-top-tier journals,with active participation from journals of medium to low impact.The implementation strategies for different open elements vary.The core dimensions of OPR,namely signed reviewer identities and open peer review reports,are adopted less frequently and are predominantly based on a voluntary model.Furthermore,there is a significant lack of standardized practices,such as assigning DOI to peer review reports.[Conclusions]OPR practices are characterized by strategic and differentiated adoption,with a conservative approach towards opening up the core elements of the review process.The heavy reliance on a voluntary model limits the potential for increasing the degree of openness.To advance OPR from a superficial to a substantive practice,journals need to progressively enhance the openness of core review stages.It is also crucial to explore effective incentive mechanisms to increase the willingness of authors and reviewers to participate in these core open practices,thereby overcoming the limitations of the voluntary model.
[Purposes]This paper aims to investigate the involvement of high-level scientists in the editorial boards of scientific journals,organize the structure of these editorial boards,and analyze the significant role they play from the scientists'perspective.It objectively presents the current state of scientists'participation in the development of scientific journals.[Methods]We investigated the data of high-level scientists through online research,analyzed the composition and size of the editorial boards of the representative scientific journals in China,and explored the current situation of scientists'participation in the construction of scientific journals through questionnaires and interviews.[Findings]The number and proportion of high-level scientists serving as editorial board members of scientific journals are related to the quality of the journals,and the size of the editorial board is related to the influence of the journals.The roles played by editorial board members in journals are more consistent with the expectations of the journal's editors.However,there are discrepancies in certain aspects.[Conclusions]The number and proportion of high-level scientists in editorial boards are related to the quality of scientific journals.While the role played by scientists as editorial board members basically meets the expectations of editors,the contribution of scientists serving on editorial boards of scientific journals still requires systematic and multidimensional evaluation.
[Purposes]This study analyzes the characteristics of how major international academic journal publishers respond to open science.It also explores the development path for open publishing of scientific journals in China.[Methods]Through literature and website research,we comprehensively organized and analyzed the latest advancements and practices of large publishers in response to open science.It included the implementation of open access,the construction of open platforms,open peer review,and the open strategies and measures of five major international academic journal publishers.[Findings]The five major international academic journal publishers have largely completed the transition from traditional publishing to open access.They emphasize the sharing of scientific research data and have comprehensive policies for data submission,storage,and utilization.They actively participate in the formulation and adherence to relevant sharing policies.Additionally,they are continually developing new publishing ecosystems and expanding business types.[Conclusions]Academic journals in China should strengthen intensive development and promote the transition to open access.They should develop standardized guiding principles and focus on the openness and utilization of scientific research data.Furthermore,they should adjust their service and function layouts to expand the types of academic services offered.
【目的】更科学准确地识别以及预测撤销论文的特征，更好地纠正科研失范、减少学术欺诈行为、保护科学的公平性。【方法】基于Pub Peer平台上受质疑论文相关数据信息，经数据处理与筛选，建立包含1792篇完整论文数据的撤销论文数据集，分析该部分撤销论文自然属性和评论属性特征，并通过构建Pub Cancel模型进行撤销论文特征识别及准确性检验。【结果】构建的Pub Cancel模型可准确、有效地识别撤销论文，撤销论文状态验证准确率高达98.24%。该方法不仅对于评估论文质量具有重要的实际意义，也可为研究人员提供一种快速评估论文可信度的方法。【结论】研究Pub Peer平台质疑论文中撤销论文的情况对学术预警研究有重要意义，应用撤销论文特征识别模型能够帮助期刊及编辑及时发现异常论文，规范论文发表并及时撤回问题论文，加强科研诚信建设。
[Purposes]This study aims to analyze the development status of Chinese geoscience journals during the funding period of the"Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals"(hereinafter referred to as the"Excellence Action Plan").Furthermore,it explores suggestions and strategies to accelerate their progress,providing references for the development of world-class scientific journals in China.[Methods]Twenty geoscience journals included in the Excellence Action Plan were selected for this study.Data such as basic journal information,database indexing,open access status,subject area distribution,editorial board composition,country/region distribution of authors,and citation impact were collected from the Web of Science database,InCites platform,and the journals'official websites.A statistical analysis was conducted based on subject distribution,internationalization,and citation impact.[Findings]The analysis shows that the internationalization level of manuscript sources and editorial board members in most geoscience journals supported by the Excellence Action Plan is relatively low,and their citation impact is mainly concentrated in China,falling short of international average standards.To improve the international influence of these journals,development suggestions are proposed,including leveraging the disciplinary strengths of universities,building international editorial boards,enhancing global dissemination,innovating publishing models,and fostering academic journal clusters.[Conclusions]The citation impact of most geoscience journals supported by the Excellence Action Plan is predominantly domestic,with limited influence in regions such as Europe and the United States.Therefore,it is essential to strengthen international communication and collaboration in leading and unique fields of Chinese geoscience research to enhance the global influence of these journals.
[Purposes]Paper-related data collection for scientific journals is a crucial prerequisite for advancing the openness,sharing,and reuse of research data.Analyzing the development process of paper-related data submission helps clarify the stage and shortcomings of data submission efforts in China,and provides insights for optimization and improvement.[Methods]Through network research and comparative analysis,we reviewed the development stages,landmark events,and evolutionary path of international paper-related data collection.We also examined the core participants and their main responsibilities.[Findings]The evolution of international data collection of scientific journals can be divided into three stages:data archiving,data publishing,and data quality control.In these stages,the data repository provides infrastructure support,publishers implement submission standards and processes,funders facilitate multi-agent cooperation,governments set macro-policy directions,and researchers perform the execution and provide feedback.[Conclusions]Compared with international developments,China needs to enhance cooperation between data repositories and scientific journals,improve the evaluation mechanisms for scientific achievements,address the needs and feedback of researchers,and strengthen research data quality control.These measures will promote the advancement of paper-related data collection for scientific journals in China.
[Purposes]This study aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of the ranking and overall standard of China's ESCI journals in terms of citation indicators on the international stage.This can provide a strong reference for accurately assessing the status and influence of China's ESCI journals internationally and further exploring strategies to develop world-class journals.[Methods]Using the WoS database,we collected and compared the main citation indicators of ESCI journals in China with those of G7 countries such as the UK,France,the US,and Japan,as well as emerging economies like Republic of Korea,India,and Russia in 2022.[Findings]ESCI journals from China demonstrate outstanding performance in impact factor,5-year impact factor,immediacy index,citation half-life,and number of citations per review article,ranking first among 11 countries.In terms of the number of journals,the number of papers,cited frequency,and eigenfactor,China's ESCI journals are behind the US,UK,and Germany.The publication cycle of China's ESCI journals is longer,and the citation half-life is relatively short.[Conclusions]To further enhance the international academic influence of China's ESCI journals and expedite their entry into the ranks of SCIE journals,several strategies should be implemented:timely adjusting the publication strategy,increasing the journal's visibility and popularity,and effectively boosting cited frequency;adopting English as the publication language and deepening cooperation with international publishers to obtain high-quality scientific research results worldwide;actively inviting internationally renowned experts and scholars to serve as editors in chief and editorial board members,enhancing the internationalization level of the editorial board,and further enhancing the international influence.
[Purposes]By constructing a standard system for mining,analysis,and service of scientific literature,this study aims to improve the quality and efficiency of knowledge acquisition,integration,and utilization in scientific literature,promote communication and cooperation among scientific journal publishing institutions,and enhance the efficiency of fine-grained knowledge mining and analysis of scientific literature in research institutions.[Methods]Using the research approach of"hierarchy-content-system-optimization strategy",and starting from six levels:national,industry,local,group,enterprise,and international standards,covering the entire process of data processing,knowledge mining,knowledge services,intelligence analysis,and integrated application,we thoroughly examined and analyzed the current status and characteristics of the standard system for mining,analysis,and service of scientific literature,and proposed optimization strategies for the standard system.[Findings]The standard system for mining,analysis,and service of scientific literature exhibits characteristics of multi-level standard separation and integration,multi-dimensional content standard integration,and hierarchical content co-construction.[Conclusions]Optimization strategies for the standard system of scientific literature mining,analysis,and service are proposed from the perspectives of promoting the systematic development of standards at all levels,improving the development of the entire process content system,and focusing on the construction of universal and domain-knowledge object standards.
【目的】基于组合创新观点量化论文的创新价值，探究科技期刊论文学术创新与关注度、影响力的关系，为理解创新在学术传播中的作用提供数据支撑。【方法】以“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”领军和重点期刊2018—2020年发表的19278篇论文为样本，采用负二项回归对学术创新与关注度、影响力的相关性进行分析。【结果】论文的学术创新与关注度和影响力均呈正相关（P均<0.05），且这一结果是稳健的。【结论】论文的学术创新不仅是提升其关注度的有效手段，更是提高其影响力的关键因素。为此建议，研判全球研究新趋势，策划跨学科专题；提升编辑学术敏锐度，精准识别创新论文；组建跨学科评审团队，确保论文评审精度。
[目的]基于卓越计划高起点新刊eLight的案例研究，总结普适性经验，为我国在新形势下创办英文科技新刊提供参考，助力我国建设世界一流科技期刊阵地。[方法] 围绕新形势下新刊国际影响力建设渠道少、成本高，我国科技期刊话语权弱势以及科学家向心力不足的问题，梳理eLight创新实践，分析实践成效，提炼普适性经验。[结果] 以领军期刊及集群等优质学术资源作为龙头带动新刊建设，可以帮助新刊高效迅速建立国际影响力；围绕科技出版的国际形势与科学家核心需求发声，有助于期刊建立话语权；加强权责、制度与工作流程的创新和细化，开拓期刊与科学家互利资源，建立多维度评估体系，可助力拓展科学家关系；[结论]我国应充分利用领军期刊及集群等优势，发挥优质资源带动作用，加强我国科技期刊群体发声与价值观输出，营造科学家社区，促进出版资源集聚，提升我国科技期刊话语权，以实现高效的世界一流科技期刊阵地建设。
[Purposes]This study aims to explore the dynamic trend of the number of journal papers and impact factors in the past five years from different dimensions and investigate the impact of the increase of the paper quantity on impact factors and the Journal Citation Indicator(JCI).[Methods]From the Web of Science(WoS)database,8094 journals continuously indexed by Science Citation Index(SCI)from 2018-2022 were chosen as the research subjects.We conducted statistical analysis and comparison of the paper quantity and impact factors across these five years.Furthermore,we analyzed the relationship among the paper quantity,impact factors,and JCI across the five years.[Findings]The total quantity of papers published annually is on the rise,while the number of journals that primarily experience an increase in paper quantity is less than that with a decrease.The overall trend for the annual average impact factors is upward,with a significantly higher number of journals reporting an increase in impact factors compared to those with a decrease.In various countries and regions and across different disciplines,the greatest increase in both the paper quantity and impact factors occurred in 2020,with the first decline observed in 2022 over the past five years.China's journals have consistently shown robust growth in both paper quantity and impact factors.Among journals with increased paper quantity,there are more journals with an increase in impact factors than those with a decrease,but the situation is reversed for the JCI.The increase in journal paper quantity does not have a statistically significant correlation with changes in impact factors and JCI(P>0.05).[Conclusions]The variations in the annual total paper quantity are markedly inconsistent with the changes in the paper quantity across individual journals.The annual increase in the impact factors shows a high degree of consistency with the year-on-year changes in the JIF of each journal.In recent years,there has been a steady enhancement in both the quantity and quality of papers published in China's SCI journals.There is no correlation between the paper quantity and the JIF,and the attempt to raise the JIF by reducing the paper quantity lacks scientific validity.
[Purposes]This paper analyzes the topics of the highly read posts in new media of laboratory medical journals,to reveal the hotspots and preferences of users,and guide the formulation of post topic optimization strategy,aiming at improving the dissemination power and influence of new media of laboratory medical journals.[Methods]Taking the WeChat official account of"Laboratory Medicine"(referred to as"Laboratory Medicine")as an example,we used Python programming to screen out the top 100 read posts published on its platform from January 1,2018 to May 31,2023.Based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model,we identified the topics of the 100 posts and analyzed them,and then proposed a corresponding post topic optimization strategy for new media of laboratory medical journals.[Findings]The topics of the highly read posts of"Laboratory Medicine"are"Policy document on nucleic acid detection for prevention and control of COVID-19","Code of conduct in the medical industry",and"Professional qualification examination and continuing education".Based on the topic identification and analysis,the topic optimization strategy of multi-voice polyphony(serialized sub-topic development,topic deduction from new perspectives,and case topic collection)is proposed.This strategy is to stretch the narrative tension of the topic of posts,from text telling to retelling text,to enhance the depth and breadth of the topic of new media posts of laboratory medicine journals.[Conclusions]By identifying and analyzing the research topic of the highly read posts on"Laboratory Medicine",it is helpful to formulate more accurate optimization strategies for the topic of posts and provides a basis for the research innovation and spatial expansion of the future topic of the highly read posts of new media of laboratory medical journals.
[Purposes]This study aims to clarify the practical foundation,realistic challenges,and future development path of metaverse-empowered preprints,and explore the development and challenges of preprint itself as well as the transformation and innovation of traditional academic journals and academic publishing ecosystem amid the metaverse era.[Methods]By means of literature research,comparative analysis,and case analysis,we reviewed the practical foundation of metaverse-empowered preprints from four aspects:intelligent technology for academic production,platform field aggregation for academic publishing,collaborative participation in academic evaluation,and multiple ways for academic diffusion.[Findings]In the development toward the metaverse era,there are many realistic challenges such as a high threshold of digital technology,disconnection between virtuality and reality,weak peer review process,and limited knowledge of relevant personnel in preprint.Therefore,it is necessary to focus on integrating industrial clusters,attracting academic synergy,leveraging intelligent tools,and strengthening immersive experiences.[Conclusions]On the basis of fully understanding the realistic challenges of preprint academic communication in the metaverse era,China should fully stimulate technological vitality and academic vitality and promote the integrated development of digitalization and academic publishing,therefore making it a powerful country in publishing.
[Purposes]This study explores the functional positioning of scientific journals within the context of open science principles and policies.It aims to fully leverage the active role of scientific journals in the knowledge production network and continually innovate the pathways for knowledge transformation and application.[Methods]Through text analysis,case studies,and logical argumentation,we compared the pathways for knowledge transformation in scientific journals under the framework of open science with those of traditional scientific journals.We extracted and summarized innovative strategies for enhancing these pathways.[Findings]Focusing on diverse stakeholders such as researchers,academic institutions,governments,and the public,this study proposes multiple pathways for knowledge transformation in scientific journals and advocates for integrated cluster development models.[Conclusions]In the context of open science,scientific journals play a crucial role as pivotal actors within the knowledge production network.They function as bridges,facilitating reformation and innovation in pathways for knowledge transformation,thus improving the efficiency and quality of knowledge transformation.
[Purposes]This study aims to provide references for China's scientific journals to apply for major international databases by systematically examining the latest selection criteria.[Methods]We systematically studied the selection criteria of major international databases and the reasons for journal rejections through literature research,comparative analysis,and case studies.In addition,we conducted qualitative analysis on representative successful application journals.[Findings]Major international databases have strict standards and standardized procedures for journal selection.Chinese scientific journals must adhere strictly to these application processes and specifications when applying.They should meticulously prepare for the application process,conduct pre-self-assessments,and learn from recently successful application cases.[Conclusions]The inclusion in major international databases is crucial for disseminating China's scientific and technological achievements and enhancing academic influence.It can also propel China's scientific journals to the forefront globally.At the same time,China should actively enhance its information security capacity for scientific literature and strengthen the construction of publishing,communication,and service platforms with broad international influence.This will truly realize the internationalization of China's journals.
[Purposes]This study aims to analyze the current situation of knowledge services in Chinese core journals of Geography and propose optimization strategies,providing a reference for the improvement and upgrading of knowledge services in scientific journals.[Methods]We focused on 20 core Chinese Geography journals listed in A Guide to the Core Journal of China(2020 Edition).Data were primarily collected from journals'official websites and WeChat official accounts regarding their specific forms of knowledge service.In addition,the knowledge services provided by the cluster platform of geographic scientific journals,the Journals of Chinese Geographic&Resource Science,were investigated.[Findings]In most core Chinese Geography journals,knowledge services are primarily concentrated on the first level of digital information services(basic services such as online publication,paper recommendation,and paper query services)and the second level of knowledge product services(knowledge search and knowledge discovery).The forms and quantity of third-level knowledge solutions(tools and applications,mobile and social services,multimedia services)are relatively limited.The current knowledge services provided by the Journals of Chinese Geographic&Resource Science focus on the second level of knowledge product services and also involve the third level of knowledge solutions,although some information updates are lagging.[Conclusions]Overall,the knowledge services of Chinese core journals in Geography are still in the initial stage and can be promoted in the future through the following approaches:improve easily implementable forms of knowledge service and enhance the user experience;develop tool services to support scientific research;integrate with new media technology to realize the"content+";expand the promotion and dissemination of key topics to better facilitate industry application and decision-making support;retain private domain traffic of the journals as a precise target for knowledge services;leverage the discipline cluster network to conduct knowledge services and establish a social service platform.
[Purposes]This study provides guidance and reference for developing open access publishing and transformation strategies for libraries in China,especially for research-intensive universities.[Methods]We started with articles published from 2012 to 2022 that were indexed by Web of Science and the transformation practices announced on publishers'websites.We then conducted a survey of the open access transformative policies of major academic journal publishers worldwide through online questionnaires and telephone interviews.In addition,we reviewed open access transformation practices in Asia using the ESAC registry.[Findings]Over 80%of major academic journal publishers have mature policies for open access transformation and substantial practical experience in developed countries,such as those in Europe and the United States.However,the open access policies in China are relatively unclear.Open access practices in Asia are primarily concentrated in Japan and Taiwan,China,with fewer initiatives in other countries and regions.[Conclusions]At this stage,the feasibility of open access transformation in Chinese university libraries,including the availability of transformative conditions and the readiness of the model,requires further exploration and practice.The Digital Resource Acquisition Alliance plays a crucial role in providing international databases to Chinese university libraries.In the future,it should fully leverage its role in advancing open access publishing and transformation efforts in China.University libraries should promptly adjust their roles and service functions.They should also collaborate with publishers,researchers,and research management departments to explore a sustainable open access publishing model better suited to China's national conditions.
[目的] 将“公地理论”引入到科学出版领域，探讨其在促进科学资源开放共享、优化科学出版流程方面的潜在价值，为构建高水平科技期刊体系提供理论支撑与实践参考；[方法] 融合去中心化、智能合约、激励机制等技术提出了“科学公地”的系统框架，建立一个由作者、审稿人、学术编辑以及仲裁委员会等多元角色共治的科学出版机制；[结果] 科学公地主要包含协同预印本与期刊互补的投稿机制、促进主体多元化的评审机制以及把控期刊质量的后评审机制，科学公地颠覆了传统的科学出版模式，将权力由出版商转移到科学家手中，实现了科学资源真正的共享，并减少了评审过程中非科学因素的干扰；[结论] 这一创新性的出版模式为科学出版领域的可持续发展提供了参考，推动其向着更为开放、公平、自由和民主的科学出版体系迈进。
[Purposes]This paper aims to deeply study and understand the influencing factors of the communication effect of scientific journal videos,which promote journal media development and facilitate widespread communication of scientific research achievements.[Methods]Starting from communication elements and processes,this paper refined the communication effect by following the process of audience psychological change,constructing a theoretical framework for identifying the influencing factors of scientific journal video communication effects.We obtained communication data from journals selected under the"Excellence Action Plan for Chinese STM Journals"(excluding popular science journals)on bilibili and conducted empirical research on the influencing factors of scientific journal video communication effects using multiple linear regression analysis.[Findings]The influencing factors of scientific journal video communication effects on bilibili mainly include communication subject elements,such as integrated subjects and sponsoring unit types;communication channel elements,such as account verification and update frequency;communication content elements,such as content themes,number of tags,subtitles,and release times.[Conclusions]Multiple strategies are proposed to enhance the communication effect of scientific journal videos:encouraging journals to collaborate,strengthening resource traction by sponsoring units,improving account credibility,maintaining moderate levels of activity,building content brands,delivering precise content,and optimizing distribution tactics.
[Purposes]This study explores the model construction and specific practical strategies of collaborative cooperation between scientific journals and knowledge-based opinion leaders in science popularization.[Methods]Employing literature analysis and case study methods,we dissected how scientific journals and opinion leaders effectively collaborate in science popularization activities,revealing key elements and operational mechanisms of their cooperative models.[Findings]Cooperation in science popularization between scientific journals and opinion leaders enables complementary advantages and mutual benefits.Based on systems theory,a cooperative science popularization model is proposed,which encompasses implementation systems,quality assurance and evaluation systems,and incentive systems.[Conclusions]Scientific journals should actively integrate internal and external resources,establish sound cooperative mechanisms,innovate science popularization formats together,expand communication channels,and enhance the social value of research outcomes.
