诗文总集编纂在宋代达到一个新高度,其中以地域命名的选本尤为突出.与前代相比,除了继承唱和地意识、乡邦观念外,宋代地域诗文集还呈现出新的特色:郡邑与名胜两类各具千秋;通代性、总结性特征显著,可作为方志的参照与补充,不仅具有存人存作的价值,还清晰展示出当地的风物景致,生动记录文人在此地的生活状态;增补、续修现象十分显著.地方官员大力参与到地域诗文集的编纂、刊刻中,这与宋代官员考核制度,尤其是南渡后朝廷对文献的重视密不可分.
《新加坡调解公约》确立了关于援用和解协议的权利以及执行和解协议的统一法律框架,为国际商事调解带来确定性和稳定性.《新加坡调解公约》的成功签署进一步推动了全球商事法律争端解决领域的司法合作,标志着国际商事调解迈向制度化发展的道路,调解将成为国际社会管控分歧、解决争议的重要手段,进而实现仲裁、调解与诉讼三驾马车合力驱动的格局.然而,目前我国商事调解处于起步阶段,法律制度尚未成熟,国内商事调解组织也缺乏相应的竞争力,和解协议在我国的执行路径与公约规定之间亦存在差异.为此,我国应以自贸区为试点开放调解市场,进而推动商事调解与国际接轨;同时要加快商事调解的立法进度,适时出台相关配套法律法规以及司法解释;构建国际与国内商事和解协议司法审查双轨制,进一步完善和解协议的执行路径.
Inflation is the most prominent feature of the Latin American economy. Before the 1980s, it was moderate and controllable, and then turned into uncontrolled hyperinflation. Until recent years, it still became a hidden worry in the economic development of Latin America. The traditional monetarism and structuralism fails to explain this shift. Starting from the relationship between money and resources, the thought of “Modern Monetary Theory” puts forward a new explanation for the causes and mechanisms of hyperinflation in Latin America: as the flow of international capital accelerated after the disintegration of the Bretton Woods system, financial liberalization reform implemented in Latin America weakened monetary sovereignty, and the transfer effect of the US dollar led to the loss of Latin America resources, aggravating the contradictions in the domestic economy, and frequently triggering hyperinflation. The experience of Latin America shows that monetary sovereignty is actually a right to control resources.Sovereign government should attach great importance to the currency issuance monopoly for their own economic security and economic stability.
From the perspective of the prescriptive nature of historical aesthetics, “category” and “typicality”are interconnected. The traditional Chinese historiography of “the method of phyletic biography of people” exhibits many aspects of “category” and “typical”. The Book of Later Han inherits the methods and systems of biographies from the Historical Records and the Book of Han, while also innovating. It chronicles people through “categories”, with the aim of seeing “one” through “many”. Through the concentration of “categories”, readers can identify “good categories” and “evil categories”, which has many characteristics of historical aesthetics and is worth pondering while appreciating in the current historical field.
"汤显祖与莎士比亚"的话题,最早源自 日本学者在1930年所著的《中国近世戏曲史》,书中对他们两人的相提并论,引发中国学者的热烈回应和学术讨论,使之成为20世纪以来中西比较戏剧研究中的焦点之一.但纵观学界对于"汤显祖与莎士比亚"的比较研究,基本上都是围绕这两位东西戏剧的代表性人物在题材来源、文体类型、情节结构、人物塑造和艺术风格等方面的异同展开的,而维系此一平行研究之基点——"同出其时",则被一语带过,仅被看作是一个有趣的巧合.事实上,汤显祖所处的中国晚明时期和莎士比亚所在的西方文艺复兴时期,既是中西方各自历史发展的重要时段,同时也是人类"大历史"在近代发生重大历史变迁的转折时代.从"大历史"观切入"汤显祖与莎士比亚"的比较研究,不仅能够揭示他们"同出其时"的时代在人类"大历史"发展进程上所代表的独特意涵,而且可以通过对他们的戏剧创作与时代之间密切联系的考察,阐明他们的戏剧创作所具有的作为"时代的灵魂"的艺术价值.
