This study examines the relationship between the type of bibliometric paper in the field of management (mapping vs. assessment) and its subsequent citation impact, while controlling for collaboration, documen type, and paper length. Using a negative binomial regression model, our findings highlight significant associations among these variables. Notably, assessment papers receive fewer citations than mapping papers, and co-authored papers receive more citations than their single-authored counterparts. Additionally, articles attract fewer citations than reviews, while longer papers tend to receive more citations. To mitigate selection bias, propensity score matching was conducted, confirming the robustness of the relationship between paper type and citation impact in a balanced dataset. The scholarly implications include more informed publication strategies and research design choices. While certain limitations exist, these results open avenues for future research, spanning longitudinal analyses, qualitative explorations, and multidisciplinary investigations, thus advancing the comprehension of factors influencing citation impact in scholarly literature.
This study aims to characterize the scientific output of the Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educaci & oacute;n, indexed in the open-access platforms Scientific Electronic Library Online and Redalyc, through a descriptive bibliometric analysis. A total of 661 articles published between 2002 and 2024 were examined, using indicators such as keywords, authorship, country of origin, language, research design, subject areas, and citation indexes. Data were systematized in spreadsheets and complemented with metrics extracted using Publish or Perish, from platforms such as Scientific Electronic Library Online, Redalyc, Google Scholar, and OpenAlex. Key findings include an average of 25.03 authors per issue, 6,112 citations across multiple databases, predominance of Spanish (94.95%), and international collaboration led by Spain, Brazil, and Mexico. The most frequent keywords were "Higher Education", "Education", and "Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)". The results indicate that the journal demonstrates continuous growth in production and citations, strengthening its relevance within the Ibero-American open-access publishing ecosystem.
This study analyzes, from a historical-discursive perspective, the processes of institutional memory construction and the mechanisms of silencing present in the technical reports of the Benedito Leite Public Library from 1915 to 1919. This is an exploratory and descriptive documentary research with a qualitative approach. The analysis was conducted based on the guidelines of content analysis, with predefined thematic categories. Between 1915 and 1919, Benedito Leite Public Library reports progressively construct an institutional narrative that oscillates between the demand for recognition and symbolic consecration. These documents highlight the appreciation of the collection as cultural heritage and the library's self-affirmation as asocial agent. At the same time, they reveal dynamics of institutionalized forgetting, such as document loss, physical degradation, and the absence of preservation policies. The memory projected in these reports coexists with silences and selections that shape the collection as a space of symbolic dispute. Thus, the construction of institutional memory is not neutral but rather the result of discursive strategies aimed at asserting the relevance of Benedito Leite Public Library in the face of challenges related to preservation and historical continuity.
Resumo Diferentes tipos de dados são utilizados e produzidos por projetos de ciência cidadã, os quais podem estar sujeitos a diversas normas relacionadas a direitos coletivos e individuais, como é o caso dos direitos de propriedade intelectual, da proteção de dados pessoais, e do uso de conhecimentos tradicionais e expressões culturais tradicionais. Empregando pesquisa bibliográfica e pesquisa documental, este artigo objetiva investigar quais são os principais desafios legais relacionados ao uso e à governança de diferentes tipos de dados em projetos de ciência cidadã, considerando normas relacionadas a direitos individuais e coletivos. A partir da análise das questões legais referenciadas na literatura sobre ciência cidadã, observa-se a predominância das discussões sobre a proteção de dados pessoais, privacidade e propriedade intelectual. Em contraste, há pouca atenção a questões relacionadas à proteção de conhecimentos tradicionais e expressões culturais tradicionais. Outros aspectos refletem a inadequação da legislação vigente em relação às formas de produção, uso e compartilhamento de conhecimento na pesquisa em geral e na ciência cidadã em particular.
Several types of data are used and generated in citizen science projects, and the use of such data may be subject to different legal frameworks governing collective and individual rights, including intellectual property rights, personal data protection, and the use of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Through bibliographic and documentary research, this article aims to investigate the main legal challenges related to the use and governance of diverse types of data in citizen science projects, considering regulations concerning both individual and collective rights. An analysis of the legal issues mentioned in the citizen science literature reveals a predominant focus on discussions regarding personal data protection, privacy, and intellectual property. In contrast, issues related to the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions receive little attention. Other aspects highlight the inadequacy of current legislation in addressing the ways in which knowledge is produced, used, and shared in scientific research in general and in citizen science in particular.
