In the process of building China of rule of law and a peaceful China in a new era, the generation logic of the security value of law needs to be taken seriously. The generation of law’s security value includes three links: the subjective logic, the theoretical logic and the system logic. Its subjective logic shows that the expression of the people’s will under the rule of law leads to the People’s subjectivity of the value of the rule of law, which leads to the People’s subjectivity of the security value of the law, and the people constitute the subject of the security value of the law. Its theoretical logic is: The ontological demand for security provides the inherent power for the generation of the value of security of law, the urgent demand for security in risk society makes security prominent in the legal value system in the evolution of the connotation of the value of security. The transformation of the concept of security provides abundant meaning for the generation of the security value of law. Its system logic is shown as follows: in the relations between security and order, freedom, equality, efficiency, human rights, justice and other legal values, there are both relations and differences, the relative independence of security in the legal value system is presented. With the change of social values and legal value system, the legal value of security is in a dynamic adjustment. These three logical links link up with each other and construct a complete logical chain of generation of law’s security value.

尽管诉权已经被提升到了人权的层面,但诉权的权利属性生成的内在逻辑并不清晰,这直接影响到在法治建设中对诉权的价值定位与制度设计.诉权的权利属性乃是现代性思潮中主体性哲学的产物.主体性哲学所体现的主观理性、个人主义、程序化思维等要素,为诉权的权利属性塑造提供了重要的理论依据、基本的主体框架以及直接的程序技术,由此诉权的权利属性得以形成,并成为现代法治的重要内容.然而,寻求正义乃是诉权贯穿于人类法治历史之中的基本意蕴所在.作为公民的一种基本权利之诉权观念,尽管成为当前诉权的主导性理念,但其在主权国家框架内所呈现出的人权与公民权之间的关系状态,以及其个体理性偏离生态理性的价值取向,使得诉权的寻求正义之意蕴难以充分彰显.

公民权利质量是新时代全面依法治国中的重要问题.目前学界对公民权利质量的研究需要从功用层面转向意义层面.公民权利质量的意义层面主要关注其认识论意义向度和价值论意义向度.认识论意义向度的公民权利质量属于权利的思维意义世界.公民权利质量的价值论意义向度关涉公民权利的实践意义世界,指向的是权利之于公民生活意义构建的价值蕴涵和精神意境.目前我国公民权利质量的意义向度存在着"形"与"神"的割裂问题,需要采取措施加以解决,以促进形成公民权利的价值意识,提高权利的意义赋予程度,展现权利之于公民生活的价值蕴涵和精神意境.

Dershowitz Alan's theory of Origin of Right think that right is origin of the consensus of the past,as well as to avoid the emergence of such evil again.The premise is that there is a common under-standing of the evil deeds.Francis Fukuyama argues that the human beings in the development of consensus exists.However,Samuel Huntington from the clash of civilizations layer facing the refuted.Based on this, consensus is not widespread.

Dr Sun Ji,Heilongjiang University law school's monograph The Modern Criminal Litigation Structure Theory,is an important work in the field of the philosophy of the criminal procedure law of China in recent years,it is permeated with exploring the philosophy of the criminal procedure law.This new research is primarily reflected in the work on critical review of the study on the construction of the criminal proceedings,depth exploration of the concept of criminal procedure and the code of criminal procedure law of persistent pursuit.

Legal Study of Special Zone Government and District Government,by Professor Wong Youwei,offers valuable background reference to examine the existing jurisdiction of counties by cities and the ongoing reform of jurisdiction of counties by provinces and expansion of county powers.Its high academic value is expressed as： creativity in the legal study of executive organizations;enlightenment for exploring the road of legal rule with Chinese characteristics;and reference value of the combined thought in the perspective of academic study.The root cause of the academic value lies in the fact that this book reflects the integrity of historical thought and rational thought and the fusion of historical logic and the logic of legal rule.

环境人权的法律化已成为人们关注的热点问题。从环境人权到环境诉权的勾连似乎顺理成章,但此种勾连的学理基础与制度基础并非无需论证。环境人权的复杂性面相在很大程度上决定了环境人权的法律化、司法化所面临的理论难题与制度障碍,欲破除此理论难题与制度障碍,需要对其所依凭的理论依据和价值观念进行反思。

The previous research of right of access to justice in China focuses on positive law field.In the field of jurisprudence the unique nature of right of access to justice is embodied in the course of transforming self-help to public power remedy.Accordingly the author puts forward three dimensions of right of access to justice,natural,legal and practical,to more deeply understand its nature and values.The values of right of access to justice are to safeguard and remedy rights,resolve disputes,restrict state power,express citizen's individual will and appeals,and stress subject of rule of law of citizens.

Globalization and legal globalization are the background and reference for the transformation of China's legal education.In theory,we shall spontaneously use global perspective and concept to examine the legal education,realize the need to transform the concept,content and mode in legal education,and understand the issues and new perspective brought about by legal globalization.

当前我国诉权研究充满愈益强烈的价值诉求与愈益精细的制度考量。诉权的价值诉求主要表现为对诉权的概念辨析、诉权的属性分析与诉权的价值思索,诉权的制度考量表现为对诉权的法律上的宏观制度完善与诉讼程序上的具体保障之探究。但这两者之间的衔接与互动显得单薄、零乱、乏力。这是因为目前的诉权研究过于简单化地以西方的法治理论及其法治经验为依据,而忽略了其深层的历史背景与理论渊源。今后我国的诉权研究应当结合全球化的时代背景,回到诉权的生成语境与我国的权利诉求之现实,达致一种诉权的价值诉求与诉权的制度考量之间有效互动的状态。

The previous research of right of access to justice in China has narrow dimension and thin jurisprudential foundation. According to logical relations between right of access to justice and constitutionalism,it is necessary to clarify the origin,the nature and values of right of access to justice from the constitutionalism dimension. The author thinks that this research is important to more deeply understand right of access to justice,highlight protection of right of access to justice in China's Constitution.

食品安全是关系国计民生的重大问题。河南省作为我国人口大省和农业大省,在食品安全保障方面肩负着尤为重要的责任与使命。近年来我省食品安全法律规制取得了一定的进展,但还存在一些问题,应当根据我国颁布实施的《食品安全法》,结合国外有关食品安全法律规制的先进经验,进一步完善我省的食品安全法律规制。

立基于进化论的理性主义,哈耶克提出了"无知"的知识观,进而认为正当行为规则构成了其否定性正义观的检验标准。据此,哈耶克对立基于唯理主义之上的肯定性正义观进行了批判,认为肯定性正义观的最终评判标准也是正当行为规则。哈耶克的这种否定性正义观同样可能具有理性独断的危险。

纵观西方国家的诉权发展历程,我们可以发现,诉权的产生和发展是与权利观念的强化以及司法权的独立紧密相联的。而权利意识的强化和司法权理论的产生、司法独立的实现都与自然法学说如影随形,难以割裂。在很大程度上,自然法即使不是诉权发展的唯一理论基础,也是其中一个至关重要的理论渊源。

This article thinks that Stoner can not disclose the theoretical relation between common law and American judicial re-view though he examines the origin of American judicial review in the tradition of common law.According to Hayek’s theory I argue that the theoretical relation lies in their abiding by rules of just conduct.Then I analyze criticism for the argument.

It is very important and necessary to strengthen the constitution protection of citizens’ action right in nowaday China’s law construction. At present the fatal defect in protection of citizens’ action right is that the constitutional lawsuit system is not established and exercised in China, from which results many factors such as mind, society, and concrete systems. It is a possible effective measure to take the constitutional private lawsuit as the first priority demonstrating the citizens’ principal status in the law system and implementing the constitution for the sake of perfecting the constitutional protection of citizens’ action right by the means of building the system of constitutional lawsuit gradually.

This article thinks that Stoner can not disclose the theoretical relation between common law and American judicial re-view though he examines the origin of American judicial review in the tradition of common law.According to Hayek’s theory I argue that the theoretical relation lies in their abiding by rules of just conduct.Then I analyze criticism for the argument.

Present theory of the rule of law has the fatal defect that citizen is absent as subject of rule of law because scholars excessively stress instrumental ration and ignore value ration.This is an important reason why China has not established and implemented so far.Some deep factors have resulted in the haste of the instrumental ration.In order to break away from the rational dilemma we need emphasize citizen's subjectivity of value ration and do rational choice according to our history and practical society.The choice is to implement prior constitutional private lawsuit to protect right of action in China's constitution and to stress citizen's subjectivity in rule of law.

根据知识社会学理论,在对全球化进行"问题化"理论处理的基础上,邓正来先生在全球化与中国法学之间建立起了某种理论勾连,为其提出"全球化时代的主体性诉求"问题提供了理论基础;通过阐述"法律理想图景"对于法律哲学的重要性,"中国法律理想图景"对于全球结构下的中国的必要性,寻求"中国法律理想图景"对于全球化时代的中国的现实紧迫性,最终使邓正来先生的"全球化时代的主体性诉求"问题得以真正出场.这一问题的提出对于中国论者极具意义,但同时其知识社会学的研究进路也有着某种限度.

In the Contract Law of China the anticipatory breach system from U. K. , U. S. A and French has been introduced. However, by comparison with theirs, there exist some defects, such as ambiguous standard of anticipatory breach system and deficient legal remedies. It is necessary to have them correspondingly completed.