中国调解有着悠久的历史,但不同历史时期的调解遵循着不同的理念。在传统中国,调解所遵循的理念就是追求社会和谐,但是,这种和谐是建立在回避矛盾、压制纠纷的基础上实现的。在新民主主义革命时期与计划经济时期,调解的理念在于正视矛盾、强调斗争,并在解决纠纷的基础上达到团结。当代中国的调解是对传统制度的继承和发扬,以实现社会管理与追求社会和谐为理念,同时也需树立规则意识、实施权利保护、秉持风险负担观念、实现意思自治原则。在认清调解理念之后,我们需要对当前一些偏离调解理念的行为保持充分的警惕,还需要进一步思考调解与审判的关系,这关系到中国司法改革的长远发展。

The people's mediation system in China, known as "The flower of the East", has been playing an important role in resolving social contradictions and disputes. The validity of the people's mediation agreement reflects the nature and value orientation of the people's mediation system, which is the key function of people's mediation system, but in the historical development of the people's mediation system, the regulations of the mediation agreement effect are not always consistent. In 2010, "People's Mediation Law" was issued in China, which can be regarded as a historical breakthrough in people's mediation agreement effect in China. However, academia and legal practice mediation agreement effect, fields have different opinions about it. Through this paper aims to examine the changing effect change, summarize the change of people's mediation agreement and feasibility of current legislation and provide a further accumulation a historical survey of the people's history of people's mediation agreement effect law, analyze the scientific nature of knowledge.

Recent social changes and ever increasing judicial demands have revealed the defects of the people's courts' traditional trial modes which results in many appeals to streamline and simplify trial proceedings,including introduction of summary proceedings to small claim actions.The essence of introducing summary proceedings to a small claim action lies in achieving efficiency while maintaining judicial fairness and justice;as such,balance of justice and efficiency is of great significance in the process of the introduction.

执行和解是化解"执行难"的重要方式之一,在司法实践中受到执行法官和当事人的广泛青睐,并能有效缓解社会矛盾,促进社会和谐。但无论是从程序上来讲还是从保护合法权益的立法目的上看,现行法律和司法解释对执行和解制度的规定都存在很大弊病,本文试图通过对执行和解制度的深入分析,从而探讨一些完善执行和解制度的可行性方案。

尽管我国为解决"执行难"问题进行了诸多尝试,但这一问题仍未得到充分解决.本文从被执行人财产申报制度这一角度出发,通过分析被执行人财产申报制度目前在我国的现状及原因,逐步探索一些完善被执行人财产申报制度的方法和建议,从而找寻破解"执行难"问题的出口.

The new China's 60 years civil procedural law science developments produced inspiring achievement in legislation,scholarly research,personnel training. In developing the Chinese characteristic socialism,in the building of socialism country under the rule of law,the civil procedural law science research must consummate unceasingly for the civil action legislation,provides more powerful theory and practice support,further develop and innovate civil procedural law science theory,consummate civil procedural law science research method system,plays a more positive role for the deepening of procedural justice idea; enhances the level of civil procedural law science professional talents.

Neutrality is the life of judgment,and judiciary neutrality is the essential requirement of jurisdiction.Judiciary neutrality is not only the major requirement of judge conduct,but also the requirement of judge ability.It is also equal to procedural justice,and it is the most essential and the most important factor in the process of realizing procedural justice and fair proceeding.This article suggests that our judiciary neutrality should be positive,relative,should be aiming to realizing procedural justice.According to this conception,this article have proposed that we should put "judiciary neutrality" in the system of essential principal,using the height of principal to protect the "judiciary neutrality",and have proposed plenty of suggestions to complete relevant systems.

<正>2008年3月20日,《司法》编辑部毋爱斌、崔茜对著名法学家常怡教授就学术研究、教书育人及新中国民事诉讼法学的研究进行了专访。问:您在教书育人方面倾注了很多心血,培养了许多优秀人才,可谓是桃李满天下,肯定有自己一套培养学生的方案。您对目前研究生培养模式有什么看法?常怡(以下简称"常"):老师需要有自己独特的培养方案,但要尊重学校的培养方案,不能脱离学校方案另搞一套。我从79年开始培养硕士生,从95年

[案情] 1994年8月8日,A公司与B公司签订600吨轧机建筑工程合同,A公司将该工程承包给甲,甲又聘请乙为该工程的具体经办人.600吨轧机工程于1994年8月18日开工,1996年2月竣工.

奥地利小说家F.卡夫卡先生(Franz Kafka)有一句名言:"一本书.如果我们读了没有感到额头被击了一猛掌.那么我们读它干什么呢?"摆在读者面前的这本《麦考密克论证据》就有如此之效果:该书通过对英美证据法丝丝入扣、环环相连的细细演绎,不但令阅读者时不时有"脑震荡"的感觉,而且也廓清了我们对英美证据法的某些误解.

The theory of the res judicata is the problem that gets much attention in the civil procedure law field,especially on the objective scope of the res judicata.There is a great deal of disputation in scholars and judicatories.After the middle of the 1990s,scolars and judicatories in China attach more importance to the issue of objective scope of the res judicata.However,our country started too late.Further research is needed on this issue.Therefore,this article analyze the theory on the objective scope of res judicata and correlative issues from the angle of theory and practice so as to attain some viable scheme.

添附制度是民法中产生物权变动法律效果的一项重要制度,添附的法律事实发生以后,一方将丧失其物的所有权而转化为对另一方的债权,或者由双方共有合成物,但是无论在何种情况下都不允许再度对合成物加以分离,从而在民事执行中也将产生对合成物恢复原状措施阻却的效力,本文通过一个真实案例的评析对这一制度加以分析。

在中国现行民事诉讼法面临修改之时,有必要对中国传统民事审判的特质以及从中体现出来的、有着深厚历史文化根基的"德性"进行考察;同时,要以对现代民事诉讼法所体现出来的传统和现代因素的理解和洞察为基础,对将来的民事诉讼法应当如何传承这种"德性"、将体现出怎样的走向以及改革的路径做出展望.

在<中华人民共和国民事证据法>的起草过程中,电子证据问题一直存在着较大的争议.本文在立足于电子证据与我国传统证据形式比较研究的基础上,针对电子证据地位的各种学说表达了自己的一些看法,并提出立法上的建议,以期确定电子证据的独立证据地位,同时也希望借此文与关心电子证据立法工作的广大同仁交流意见,互相学习,促进我国民事证据立法工作的顺利、健康发展.

2004年3月14日,第十届全国人民代表大会第二次会议通过第四次宪法修正案,首次将"人权"概念引入宪法规范,在<中华人民共和国宪法>第二章第三十三条增加一款规定:国家尊重和保护人权.以"人权"人宪作为标志,中国已经在把"人权"从政治概念转化为法律概念的道路上迈出了第一步.

电子证据是我国证据法学研究中一个较新的课题.一直以来,理论界对电子证据的法律地位、概念和内涵等诸多问题颇具争议,司法实务界在对其适用上也较为混乱.电子证据具有独立性,在新的民事证据立法中应作为一独立的证据形式加以明确.在对电子证据和视听资料概念和内涵进行比较、分析的基础上,通过对两者的界清和重构,可以较好地理清两者之间的关系,消除传统证据分类观念对电子证据独立性的负面影响.

诉讼时效是民法的概念,但其却在民事诉讼中运用.要在民法上发生丧失时效利益的结果,在民事诉讼中就须先作出已逾诉讼时效的判断.在<民法通则>中,立法者用一章,共7个条文规定了诉讼时效的长短、起算、中止和中断,后经下级法院在此问题上疑难案件的请示,最高人民法院又在其司法解释和批复中对此问题有若干补充规定,明确在几种具体情况下当事人超过诉讼时效的民事权利是否还受法律保护.

This article is based on the emphasis of importance of time limit of adducing evidence in the practice of adjudication, firstly giving a comparative analysis, and then pointing out the disadvantage of any time proof - taking doctrine and the necessity of establishment of adducing evidence about time limit, finally according to a case, present the author's views by using positive analysis.

1982年我国的<民事诉讼法(试行)>没有规定当事人可对管辖权提出异议,在其后的"判决和裁定"一节内容中也没有出现"管辖权异议裁定"这样一种类型.