Background: Sleep quality is an important dimension of sleep health. There are few studies on the relationship between residential environment and sleep quality in China. We validated the connection between them and explored the moderating role of spatial-geographic characteristics and the role of emotional stress and somatic function as mediators.Methods: Using survey data collected by the Chinese General Social Survey in 2021, 2717 respondents were included in the analysis. First, OLS regression was used for baseline analysis. Second, a generalized ordered logit model was used to analyze the more precise correlations between residential environ-mental health and sleep quality. Finally, the mediating role of emotional stress and somatic function was explored using the KHB method.Results: In the baseline analysis, both the positive correlations of residential natural environmental health and residential health resources on people's sleep quality were tested. Further analysis revealed that the correlation of natural environmental health was more about protecting people from poor sleep quality (having "good" and "very good" sleep quality). The residential health resources correlated with whether people reported very good sleep quality. Regional development disparities played a negative moderating role in the relationship between residential health resources and sleep quality. Also, the mediating role of emotional stress and somatic function were supported, and the mediating role of somatic function was higher in proportion.Conclusion: Sleep quality was positively correlated with residential environmental health; the economic development gap between regions played a moderating role; and the correlation was generated by people's emotional stress and somatic function. In the development of public health policy, it is necessary to actively address various environmental issues, provide convenient health facilities in living spaces, and bolster the policy inclinations of less developed areas.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

为促进中国环境社会学的快速发展,需高度重视环境社会学的实践自觉,以彰显时代性、本土性与干预性特质.环境社会学学者需主动投身我国生态文明建设实践,积极探讨全球性环境问题,直面网络化时代挑战,有效提炼中国经验,关切生活者的日常生活实践,以此推动中国环境社会学实践品格的塑造与锤炼.

在"社会化"论和"社会结构"论看来,母亲与环境的亲密关系浑然天成.那么中国的母亲群体在现实生活中是否表现得更环保、更亲环境呢?本文使用CGSS2013数据,勾勒了中国母亲群体的日常环境行为图景,并基于对客观结构和主观感知与母亲群体环境行为关系的考量,在母亲身份、社会交往、环境污染感知等关系维度上,探讨了中国母亲群体环境行为的影响因素及路径.研究发现,在公共领域环境行为上父亲表现得更积极,非母亲女性在私人领域和公共领域环境行为上都表现得比母亲群体更积极;媒体使用、环境污染感知、受教育年限等对母亲环境行为具有显著直接影响作用;媒体使用、社会交往亦通过环境污染感知对母亲环境行为产生间接影响.作为日常生活中的空间实践,中国母亲群体环境行为受到来自环境污染感知的多路径、复杂性影响.母亲群体积极参与环境保护是推动生态型社会建设的重要力量,为此,应激发母亲群体的"亲环境"意识,以此推动生态型社区/社会的建设及绿色消费生活的普及;同时,在公共政策设计上,为不同生命周期的母亲群体提供更全面的社会支持和社会福利保障.

结合认同理论和环境行为理论模式,利用大学生环境素养调查数据,侧重探究环境身份、环境态度对大学生绿色消费行为和环境参与行为的可能影响.研究发现,环境态度假设未获支持,环境身份假设得到部分验证.具体而言,整体环境身份对大学生环境行为的影响有限,而环境态度对大学生环境行为并无显著影响.大学生环境身份显著性和环境身份突出性越强,其实施的绿色消费行为和环境参与行为越多.环境身份承诺广度对大学生环境行为有着显著的正向影响,而环境身份承诺深度对其并无显著影响.环境行为意向对大学生绿色消费行为有着显著的直接影响和一定的中介作用,而环境行为意向对大学生环境参与行为并无显著影响.

基于2013年中国综合社会调查(CGSS2013)健康模块和环境模块的数据,围绕居民健康状况对环境行为的影响进行了探讨,研究发现:健康促进论得到部分验证.具体而言:居民的客观健康状况越差,则获取越丰富的环境健康知识,并积极采取健康促进行为,进而实施越多的私域环境行为与公域环境行为;居民的主观健康状况越好,越倾向于实施私域环境行为,并通过环境忧虑感、环境健康知识、健康促进行为对私域环境行为和公域环境行为产生间接影响,其中环境忧虑感、环境健康知识和健康促进行为对私域环境行为起着部分中介作用,对公域环境行为则存在着遮掩效应.为了保护环境,提升居民的健康水平,在居民的环境教育与环境宣传过程中,应基于居民健康状况等因素采取差异化策略,以唤起其环境情感共鸣或提升其环境认知水平,增促其实施更多的环境行为.

基于2010CGSS城市居民环境模块的数据,结合计划行为理论、价值-信念-规范理论与社会两难论,围绕行为控制、环境责任感对城市居民环境行为的影响展开探讨.研究表明:行为控制假设和环境行为意向假设得以验证,而环境责任感假设未获支持.具体而言,环境效能感越强、主体控制能力越强、环境行为意向越强烈的城市居民,实施越多的环境行为.环境效能感、主体控制能力在直接影响环境行为的同时,亦借助环境行为意向这一中介变量间接影响环境行为,但中介作用相对较小.

基于2010年中国综合社会调查(CGSS2010)环境模块的数据,围绕教育程度、后物质主义价值观对我国80后环境风险认知的影响进行探讨.研究发现:相比其他年龄阶段的人群,80后环境风险认知总体水平较高.教育程度直接影响80后环境风险认知的同时,亦通过环境知识对其产生间接影响;后物质主义价值观对80后环境风险认知并无显著的直接影响,但通过环境知识对其产生一定的间接影响.

"空巢青年"作为一个特定的群体已是一个不争的事实,独居往往是"空巢青年"经过权衡之后所做出的主体选择.社会个体化的趋向、自我意识的觉醒、自身需求的满足促使"空巢青年"选择独居作为自己的生活方式,而社会化的变革、观念的革新、信息技术的发展使得独居成为可能.故面对"空巢青年",我们应避免"标签化"和"污名化"的目光,正视独居作为一种生活方式,并关注到部分"空巢青年"的暂时性特征.

本文通过对改革开放以来环境社会学研究的梳理,呈现出生态环境领域我国社会结构变迁的以下特征:城乡二元结构的持续影响与生态环境约束的日益凸显、消费主义的盛行与绿色生活的推崇、环境问题的聚焦建构与环境行动的虚拟支持、环境不公的全球扩散与共同行动的积极倡导、绿色发展的着力推进与环境治理的不断深化.进而提出应着重对城乡不平等与绿色城镇化、绿色生活方式、网络环境行动、全球性环境问题以及复合型环境治理展开深入探讨,以进一步提升我国环境社会学的研究水平.

Based on China General Social Survey of the environmental section data in 2003 and 2010, the article analyzes the influence of urban residents’ environmental cognition on environmental behavior. The study finds that the more urban residents know about environmental protection, the more environmental behaviors they will have. Hypotheses of environmental protection knowledge, and of the severity of environmental problem are verified, and hypothesis of environmental risk recognition is partly verified. Specifically speaking, urban residents with richer environmental protection knowledge exert more environmental behaviours; daily environmental risk cognition has a significant positive influence on the private-sphere environmental behavior, but technological environmental risk cognition has no significant effect. The urban residents who consider environmental problem to be more serious would implement more environmental behavior, but the effect of the recognition of the national environment severity on environmental behavior is less thanthe corresponding impact ofcognition of local environment severity. And the more degraded the local environmental cognition is, the greater theimpact on the environment behavior. Therefore, the article proposes that the multi-social subjects should actively carry out various forms of environmental education, environmental publicity activities and environmental protection experience so as to enhance the level of environmental cognition and cultivate more environmental behavior.

为贯彻落实中央有关部门关于加强社会工作人才队伍建设的意见和指示,我们采用问卷调查和深度访谈方法,对湖南省青少年事务社会工作人才队伍建设情况开展调查研究.调查显示,近年来湖南省相关工作取得了一定成绩,社会工作者也表现出较强奉献精神,但还存在需求缺口较大、政府推动不足、社会认同偏低等问题.为此,本文提出了形成新常态共识、推进嵌入式发展和加紧岗位开发与教育培训等政策建议.

This paper hackles the study on factors of foreign environmental behavior research,which based on psychological factors and the combination of internal and external factors.Then we found that most studies believe that environmental behavior is a choice of selfdiscipline and self-control to fit their own reality,which can improve the environmental condition and enhance the environmental quality.In order to reveal the implementation of environmental behavior of the internal process and psychological mechanism,most studies treat environmental attitude or environmental concern as a key variable.And most research use questionnaire to collect data of a certain,utilizing structural equation model and other advanced statistical methods to explore self-reported environmental behavior.These studies ignored external structural factors,such as socio-economic development,cultural change,class differentiation,regional differences,information segmentation,which may shape the environmental psychology and dynamic impact on environmental behavior.In order to break through the limitations of existing research,we should accurately understand the connotation of environmental behavior,use the questionnaire survey,experimental method,field observation and depth interviews to collect longitudinal data,and combine the psychological factors with structural factors to explore different types of environmental behavior.

Based on social action theory and relevant researches, we build a structural constraint model to explore the relationships between class status, regional differences and environmental information acquisi tion and urban residents' environmental behavior. The results suggest that the model is largely valid. Unfor tunely, the class status assumption is only partially verified, and the possible reasons are: 1) the fragmentation of class status, 2) lack of environmental protection class basis and, 3) central tendency of class identification.City difference hypothesis is accepted, while egional differences hypothesis is not supported, which reflects the limitation of pollution drive theory. Environmental information acquisition directly affects the environmen tal behavior, which also plays an important intermediary role. Factors affecting private-sphere environmental behavior and public-sphere environmental behavior are different, and the former can be better explained by structural factors. In order to promote future research, we propose to adopt various research methods to collect longitudinal data, comparative analysis of the environmental behavior between urban and rural residents, and combine the psychological factors with structural factors to explore different types of environmental behavior.

如何测量社会建设水平,判断社会政策的影响与作用,愈发重要且紧迫。文章在准确理解社会建设核心内涵与关键任务的基础上,借鉴国内外相关经验以及结合我国具体实际,初步构建出社会建设指标体系。

基于CGSS2010数据统计,可以分析中国居民的环境治理责任认知状况,以及检验影响中国居民环境责任认知的因素。描述性统计研究发现:（1）在环境责任认知方面,居民倾向于把环境保护责任归咎于政府和企业,自我避责倾向严重;存在环境认知的"两体分离"现象,即在宏观层面关注环境问题,在日常生活中忽视环境保护;（2）logistic回归结果显示:对环境污染严重性、关切度,以及对人与环境关系和经济增长与环境保护关系的认知对于居民的环保责任认知没有显著性影响;教育水平是影响居民环保责任认知的关键因素之一。处于"元治理"角色的政府要通过经济激励强化企业环保责任,借助社会激励手段加强公民个人的环境保护责任。此外,也要加强制度设计,强化政府环保责任,预防政府在环境治理中的寻租腐败。

经过十多年的制度实践,我国已初步建立起以居民最低生活保障制度为核心的社会救助体系,社会救助的管理体制和运行机制也日渐完善,社会救助工作管理和服务水平逐步提高。但仍存在诸多问题。要逐步调整和转变观念以树立现代社会救助理念、积极推动社会救助体系的有机整合、着力提升社会救助的专业化水平以及大力发展社会互助,促进政府救助与社会互助的平衡等,进而进一步完善我国社会救助体系。

在国内公众环境诉求与国外环境压力的双重推动下,我国政府逐渐奉行经济与环境双赢的政策选择,着重协调经济发展与环境保护之间的关系。这透视出我国社会管理的新趋向与生态现代化的理论倡导有着内在的一致性。我国迈向生态现代化应根据国情,选择符合自身实际的道路。

At present,the daily behavior of the public has become the important cause of environmental problems.Weak participation,shallow level and simplicity are its characteristics,which cannot be conducive to improving environmental conditions and environmental quality.Based on the specific conditions of our society and combined with the practice of the daily life of the public,this paper discusses how to cultivate the environmental behavior of the public.

环境行为是环境社会学的研究重点之一。为了更好地把握我国环境行为研究现状,侧重从政策取向视角、环境态度—环境行为关系视角、社会结构视角等对国内环境行为相关研究进行较为全面的梳理。研究发现,既有研究普遍流于现状描述,较为缺乏理论关怀与理论解释,尤为忽视环境行为背后的结构性因素及其生成机制。进而提出应超越环境态度研究的范畴,将心理性因素与结构性因素加以结合,直接对环境行为开展理论导向的实证研究。

<正>针对农村家庭养老存在的诸多问题,国家通过不断完善农村养老保险制度、五保供养制度以及大力发展机构养老和慈善事业等以寻求解决之策。但令人遗憾的是,现有农村养老保障制度实践侧重关注的是农村老年人的经济需求,往往忽略了其生活照料、情感交流、精神慰藉等方面的需求;将老年人视为